kskboys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,192
- Reaction score
- 49,986
Self aggrandizement.Irony.
Self aggrandizement.Irony.
Good chance.Like hell he would. Aikman probably wins the Super Bowl with that team.
That is the miserable truth.Bwahahahaha suck it haters!
Leggo Dak!!!
QB1 for 5 more years!
we demonstrated you do not understand what aggregate stats are versus efficiency stats based on you arguing as if the OP was aggregate stats as opposed to efficiency stats.Self aggrandizement.
Well, we will have to agree to disagree on that. I don’t believe there is any L to take. All these NexGEN stats, or whatever, are just paralysis by analysis.no you don't , if you want to get a true assessment of an individual/team performance, you have to look past the raw numbers. just take the L
then you don't understand team sports, nothing is as basic as that in sports.Well, we will have to agree to disagree on that. I don’t believe there is any L to take. All these NexGEN stats, or whatever, are just paralysis by analysis.
The game is about scoring more points than your opponent in order to win the game. Everybody realizes that there are factors that influence how many points are scored or allowed. I feel any attempt to look beyond the basics is just an attempt to rationalize an ill-advised preconceived opinion as factual.
I’m not saying that there is no room for analytics in football… I am saying that they can be overused. Sometimes you just have to be able to ‘see’ what’s right in front of you… and not look for something that you ‘want’ to see
PM was League MVP year 6 and 7. Seems Dak is on a different trajectory but somehow folks think they should be compared. Losing to the goat in multiple championship games is tough but at least it wasn't the wild card against Brock PurdyI just did a quick Peyton Manning search, his first 6 season, he's had more 500+ pass attempt seasons than Dak first 6 seasons.
it depends on when and who you consider his contemporaries
I am pretty sure that after watching 50 years of football, I have a little inkling of what I’m looking at. I’m not here to change your mind…and you’re not going to change mine. We will have to agree to disagree as I said…So you can feel free to move on with someone elsethen you don't understand team sports, nothing is as basic as that in sports.
right on Brand and off topic , whose talking about mvp. it just shows the passing attempts , try comprehending and stay on topicPM was League MVP year 6 and 7. Seems Dak is on a different trajectory but somehow folks think they should be compared. Losing to the goat in multiple championship games is tough but at least it wasn't the wild card against Brock Purdy
watching 50 years mean nothing. you obviously haven't learned a thing about team sports with the comments you made in this thread, or you're trollingI am pretty sure that after watching 50 years of football, I have a little inkling of what I’m looking at. I’m not here to change your mind…and you’re not going to change mine. We will have to agree to disagree as I said…So you can feel free to move on with someone else
Championship games against Brady. He lost to the Goat multiple times. Rogers and Brady have the first row in Jerry world reserved for the family they have won so many games there. Kyler Murray has his own booth. Dak is losing to Mr irrelevant in the play in game. On topic and full comprehension. Who cares about attempts and which way the wind was blowing. Stattwisters for Statscott. Cool group. Next?right on Brand and off topic , whose talking about mvp. it just shows the passing attempts , try comprehending and stay on topic
What point you're trying to make.we demonstrated you do not understand what aggregate stats are versus efficiency stats based on you arguing as if the OP was aggregate stats as opposed to efficiency stats.
The length of how long something runs is not relevant when talking about efficiency specifically it only matters in aggregate.
So what do we not understand? I won't hold my breath.
Yes as we all know, Aikman had a ton of success when he didn't have the stacked teams Jimmy built.Like hell he would. Aikman probably wins the Super Bowl with that team.
The D in 07 was 9th in the NFL.Yes as we all know, Aikman had a ton of success when he didn't have the stacked teams Jimmy built.
He would have been able to beat the Giants, the Packers, and the undefeated Pats with a mediocre defense and gimpy top 2 receivers.
If the Wild Card Giants could; prime Aikman and the 2007 Cowboys with their 13 pro bowlers would.Yes as we all know, Aikman had a ton of success when he didn't have the stacked teams Jimmy built.
He would have been able to beat the Giants, the Packers, and the undefeated Pats with a mediocre defense and gimpy top 2 receivers.
They were 13th in points against, and 14th in points against per drive.The D in 07 was 9th in the NFL.
Hard to say, does Wade grow a set and unleash the pass rush, or does he curl up in his usual fetal position in big moments?
The wild card Giants had a defense that stepped up in the playoffs, Romo never had that.If the Wild Card Giants could; prime Aikman and the 2007 Cowboys with their 13 pro bowlers would.
Aikman knew how to get the lead with an efficient passing game and allow the running game to ball control and run clock. The Cowboys had a pro bowl RB and 3 pro bowlers on the OL. The Cowboys also had a first team all pro WR and TE.
Tons of offensive and defensive weapons in 2007.
Romo was a Favre type QB (gunslinger) and Aikman defeated Favre three times in the playoffs.
That is a difference between prime Aikman and prime Romo/Dak.They were 13th in points against, and 14th in points against per drive.
The wild card Giants had a defense that stepped up in the playoffs, Romo never had that.
The defense was mediocre in 2007 even with all of the pro bowlers, and the most deadly offensive weapons were injured in the playoffs.
Romo being a gunslinger didn't cause any issues this game as his only turnover was a hail mary type throw for the end zone on 4th down with minimal time remaining.
It's possible Aikman beats the Giants, Romo would have if his only healthy receiver didn't quit on the second to last play of the game. I think either QB would have likely beat the Packers as well, but neither QB was beating the Pats.
you're making me for it at this point.What point you're trying to make.
Again stay on topic, start another thread, this thread isn't about who this one and that one lost to. If you didn't have anything on the topic, you should just sit it out.Championship games against Brady. He lost to the Goat multiple times. Rogers and Brady have the first row in Jerry world reserved for the family they have won so many games there. Kyler Murray has his own booth. Dak is losing to Mr irrelevant in the play in game. On topic and full comprehension. Who cares about attempts and which way the wind was blowing. Stattwisters for Statscott. Cool group. Next?