Dak Prescott unappreciation thread

[The Natural]

Just as I'm not surprised by anyone that doesn't understand how other teams are able to build quality rosters even with high-priced QB's. And, yes, I'm well aware of the fact that new deals are about past performance and expected future performance. And, OBVIOUSLY, you haven't paid any attention the fact that I have absolutely said Dak has played like ish. But, like others, if I don't solely blame Dak for all this teams issues, then I'm a Dak Stan. Whatever you say bro.

You still in DC, Jeffrey?

 

[JeffInDC]

You still in DC, Jeffrey?

Yeah, I am. Your point?

 

[The Natural]

Yeah, I am. Your point?

I'll be there in a few weeks you gonna run this fade

 

[JeffInDC]

I'll be there in a few weeks you gonna run this fade

Is that a threat? So, you can talk ish to people, but people can't respond? Ok.

 

[jsb357]

It's a good thing Dak has that dog in him. Otherwise they would have really taken us out behind the woodshed.

 

[The Natural]

Is that a threat?

I'll send the location ahead of time just make sure you show up

 

[JeffInDC]

I'll send the location ahead of time just make sure you show up

I ain't going to jail or fooling with you because you can talk ish but can't take it when somebody responds in the same tone you send out.

 

[The Natural]

I ain't going to jail or fooling with you because you can talk ish but can't take it when somebody responds in the same tone you send out.

its the first annual CZ fade, for charity

 

[JeffInDC]

its the first annual CZ fade, for charity

What are you talking about?

 

[The Natural]

What are you talking about?

Man I'm just passing time on the clock, Dak'n if you will

 

[JeffInDC]

Man I'm just passing time on the clock, Dak'n if you will

Ok

 

[Cowboys5217]

So, at your job, you've been cool taking less for the benefit of your fellow workers, right?

If I made 240 million? Sure. No problem. I could part with some of that for my fellow workers since we are ultimately competing for a world title that is the whole point of our employment.

Tell me, what world title do you compete for in your Joe Job? Do you make 240 million doing it?

 

[JeffInDC]

If I made 240 million? Sure. No problem. I could part with some of that for my fellow workers since we are ultimately competing for a world title that is the whole point of our employment.

Tell me, what world title do you compete for in your Joe Job? Do you make 240 million doing it?

Absolutely not. But, as DLaw basically said years ago it's not HIS job to help the FO. If other FO's can manage to pay their Top Players TOP $$$ and, yet, continue to add TOP $$$ players, is that on Dak or is that on the FO?

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Where Dak could have been good, he wasn't.

I know there are issues everywhere with this version of the Dallas Cowboys....

But where $60M Dak could have been good Sunday, he wasn't.

Yes. I don;t get what is dang difficult about assessing Dak just on his own. These people have SHOWN the will do it to another QB in heartbeat when they're in a dak fight.

 

[kskboys]

If I made 240 million? Sure. No problem. I could part with some of that for my fellow workers since we are ultimately competing for a world title that is the whole point of our employment.

Tell me, what world title do you compete for in your Joe Job? Do you make 240 million doing it?

Woudn't bother me one iota of a bit to take 220 mil instead if it benefitted people around me.

 

[kskboys]

Absolutely not. But, as DLaw basically said years ago it's not HIS job to help the FO. If other FO's can manage to pay their Top Players TOP $$$ and, yet, continue to add TOP $$$ players, is that on Dak or is that on the FO?

Both.

And it's not even about lesser money. It's about a longer term contract so the money can be pushed down the road in order to bring in some high quality players. Dak refuses, so yes it's on Dak.

 

[Mikexike]

You left out the defense, but go ahead and stick with your Dak agenda.

Problem with this statement is, Dak and the Offense leaves the defense out to dry and they are worn out by the second half.

Can't defend anyone when your on the field most of the the game because of the lack of offensive execution.

 

[KJJ]

Problem with this statement is, Dak and the Offense leaves the defense out to dry and they are worn out by the second half.

Can't defend anyone when your on the field most of the the game because of the lack of offensive execution.

The defense can’t keep anyone out of the endzone. The Saints, Ravens and Lions scored TDs on their first possession. We can’t stop the run and we’re not pressuring the QB. That’s not Dak and the offenses fault. Some of you continue to defend the defense when it’s been garbage. The main problem with the offense is our OL is struggling and we can’t run the ball. Guyton has struggled. I said if our draft picks don’t hit the ground running we’ll be in trouble. We did virtually nothing in free agency and the only chance we had to make any improvement was with our draft.

 

[kskboys]

The defense can’t keep anyone out of the endzone. The Saints, Ravens and Lions scored TDs on their first possession. We can’t stop the run and we’re not pressuring the QB. That’s not Dak and the offenses fault. Some of you continue to defend the defense when it’s been garbage. The main problem with the offense is our OL is struggling and we can’t run the ball. Guyton has struggled. I said if our draft picks don’t hit the ground running we’ll be in trouble. We did virtually nothing in free agency and the only chance we had to make any improvement was with our draft.

The O and D have both been garbage.

 

[JeffInDC]

Both.

And it's not even about lesser money. It's about a longer term contract so the money can be pushed down the road in order to bring in some high quality players. Dak refuses, so yes it's on Dak.

Then, why is the FO agreeing to the deals. And, Dak’s deal is a 4-year extension on his last year of his existing deal. Thus, it’s basically a standard 5 year deal they can get out in 2026.