My earlier hesitancy has been sustained. The chemistry defense shall always remain the euphoria alibi.
I remember having a face-to-face conversation with another Cowboy fan, whom I had many previous discussions about Romo--usually at our barbershop. He appreciation for Romo faded after the 2008 season. After that, all of our debates about the position were him taking the stance 'Anyone but Romo'.
Fast forward to August 2016. Romo injury happened. My friend was again elated (happened every time Romo was sidelined) and then beyond happy with Prescott's performance. Around late October I brought up the possibility of Romo's return. He said Romo's days in Dallas were done, which of course ended up becoming true.
I asked, "What about the playoffs?"
He threw the same question back at me, "What about the playoffs?"
I replied, "Well, the team has a lot of momentum and it looks like the playoffs are a solid lock. Don't you think the offense needs Romo's veteran leadership to push for a possible Super Bowl?"
He said it did not matter. I asked him to clarify. He said the Super Bowl did not matter and that the only thing that mattered was Romo not being behind center.
I am the stubborn type and asked, "Do you believe a rookie quarterback can help get the team to and win the Super Bowl?"
He stared me dead in the eyes and said, "I don't expect us to get to the Super Bowl. It is not important. Stop asking me questions."
And I did.
Our convos became a lot less heated afterwards. I knew exactly how he felt about Romo and how championships did not matter to him as long as Romo was on the roster. He has never predicted Super Bowls with Prescott but he has been a much happier fan since Romo's departure. He gained my total respect in 2016. He was never caught up in the euphoria that season.
/my road down memory lane