Dak should be given two more seasons after this one to win

[MountaineerCowboy]

PROVE that. One game. Hanging your hat on 5.8% of a season.

BRILLIANT, I tell ya.

I'm sending Moore a sternly worded letter!

You're right.

I'm sure that was the only game Dak has ever changed runs to passes in.

Stupid me.

 

[Jayinem]

Most do. Unlike you football "gurus" who still think the QB ALONE renders a.team loss.

You forget........it ain't your money. Deal with it. Dallas ould be 100 mill under the cap and Stevie ain't spending. You "forget" that, conveniently. Next.

Wow sounds like a ringing endorsement for Dak. Basically "you're stuck with Dak because the Jones' won't spend deal with it" instead of claiming Dak is good?

 

[wssaustin]

Your logic just got holes all over the place.
1st, no teams are the same and no QBs are the same, so each team should make its own decisions upon franchise QBs individually, using one team's QB as standard just does not make any sense;
2nd, if you want to adhere to some kind of standard, why choose Raiders? Since when did Raiders and Derek Carr become the standard for anything in NFL? Did they build any sort of success in recent years? The only thing is, there is a number, which is 9 and it is bigger than 7.

 

[Booger]

You're right.

I'm sure that was the only game Dak has ever changed runs to passes in.

Stupid me.

Always right or wrong with you. This is where you fail, epically. Grow up.

I'll leave the stupid to your discretion.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Always right or wrong with you. This is where you fail, epically. Grow up.

I'll leave the stupid to your discretion.

I had evidence while you go off your feels.

Maybe it was just 1 game from last year, but it's still 1 more game than you have to support your opinion on the matter.

 

[Buzzbait]

Our QB threw 1 TD and 1 INT in a home game the last time we were in the playoffs. Is that our defenses fault?

The first playoff game he threw 3 TDs but it was to make a comeback that came up short which he often does, the next 3 playoff games he's averaged 1 TD per game. 6 TDs in 4 games is not very good. None of that is on our defense. If we were losing 35-32 games in the playoffs you got me (it happened in the Packers game only) but that's not what's happening in the others. Dak is coming up small.

I have never defended Dak when he puts up a poor performance. When he's good he's pretty good, when he's bad he's bad. But what's that got to do with our need for a strong defense? Nothing! No matter how Dak plays, we still need a strong defense.

You keep harping on how bad Dak is along with all the avid Dak detractors, but you NEVER offer any suggestions on how to solve the problem! Why? because of his no trade contract and the enormous cost it would take to do anything about it.
But we DO know how to get a strong defense, the draft and FA. We COULD do that!
So if the Dak haters are such super fans, instead of constantly posting on what we can't do because of circumstances, why not post on what we CAN do? Like build this defense???

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

You must be 9 years old. In another 20 years you will get. Let your dak hatred go. It's not healthy.

My, my.
I am expected to swoon, like you, to a QB who has not done squat for us?
Dak's lone career playoff victory stands the test of ages to you.
To me, he is the latest playoffs disappointment.

 

[Booger]

Wow sounds like a ringing endorsement for Dak. Basically "you're stuck with Dak because the Jones' won't spend deal with it" instead of claiming Dak is good?

Wow......what? Seriously, you suck at this. A ringing endorsement for Dak? Need I type shower for ya?

 

[Jayinem]

Wow......what? Seriously, you suck at this. A ringing endorsement for Dak? Need I type shower for ya?

Wat?

 

[Jayinem]

Let me ask Dak above Cowboy fans, if Dak gets traded would you root for the team he gets traded to? You already don't care about the Cowboys success so it'd be a pretty simple transition. Some of us were fans before Dak was even born and will be fans after Dak is cut or traded.

Dak isn't staying here until he's Tom Brady age without winning anything like you hope.

 

[Booger]

I had evidence while you go off your feels.

Maybe it was just 1 game from last year, but it's still 1 more game than you have to support your opinion on the matter.

Stop posting like a. 12 year old girl. Feels?

I have no evidence. I said that. Nor do you excluding ONE game. I even laid out your crap percentage. And you come back with "feels"? Okie dokie, Skittles.

 

[Booger]

Wat?

FAIL....

 

[Jayinem]

FAIL....

I'm sorry I don't know what "Need I type shower for ya?" means. You'll have to explain that one to me.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Stop posting like a. 12 year old girl. Feels?

I have no evidence. I said that. Nor do you excluding ONE game. I even laid out your crap percentage. And you come back with "feels"? Okie dokie, Skittles.

The littlest bit of evidence will always hold more weight than none at all.

 

[Rockport]

The littlest bit of evidence will always hold more weight than none at all.

12 year old girl? Explains a lot.

 

[Wangchung83]

I have never defended Dak when he puts up a poor performance. When he's good he's pretty good, when he's bad he's bad. But what's that got to do with our need for a strong defense? Nothing! No matter how Dak plays, we still need a strong defense.

You keep harping on how bad Dak is along with all the avid Dak detractors, but you NEVER offer any suggestions on how to solve the problem! Why? because of his no trade contract and the enormous cost it would take to do anything about it.
But we DO know how to get a strong defense, the draft and FA. We COULD do that!
So if the Dak haters are such super fans, instead of constantly posting on what we can't do because of circumstances, why not post on what we CAN do? Like build this defense???

That’s the point you can’t have Dak at his salary and what he takes supporting cast wise and have a good defense. You have to pick, great QB that doesn’t need first round wr’s running backs, and o line that’s paid like our offense and have a great defense. If we played our cards right for once we would learn that Tony, Dak, and company don’t get resources if they are paid elite, they get average supporting cast that rely on them to elevate those players. That is the way you cap spending on offense and still have money for a great defense. The other option is to get bud driver, pay bus driver average salary and sale them that savings are going to getting them supporting cast. Third option is hope you hit it big in the draft and win early in that players career before having to make a decision on paying elite money(most unpredictable option). Either way Dak is the fourth option, which is overpay your QB, that’s a bus driver, and put all your money on offense. This leads to no depth on defense, no money for improving defense in FA, and simply hoping they outplay there contracts. Just my opinion, but for 20+ years we have overspent on offense, leading to wishful thinking on defense.

 

[Buzzbait]

That’s the point you can’t have Dak at his salary and what he takes supporting cast wise and have a good defense. You have to pick, great QB that doesn’t need first round wr’s running backs, and o line that’s paid like our offense and have a great defense. If we played our cards right for once we would learn that Tony, Dak, and company don’t get resources if they are paid elite, they get average supporting cast that rely on them to elevate those players. That is the way you cap spending on offense and still have money for a great defense. The other option is to get bud driver, pay bus driver average salary and sale them that savings are going to getting them supporting cast. Third option is hope you hit it big in the draft and win early in that players career before having to make a decision on paying elite money(most unpredictable option). Either way Dak is the fourth option, which is overpay your QB, that’s a bus driver, and put all your money on offense. This leads to no depth on defense, no money for improving defense in FA, and simply hoping they outplay there contracts. Just my opinion, but for 20+ years we have overspent on offense, leading to wishful thinking on defense.

I never did like the contract they gave Dak, and for the very reasons you pointed out. The Cap limits the amount of money to spend, and the more you spend on one position the less you have for the other positions.

 

[Coogiguy03]

Can we stop with this QBs win by themselves nonsense? Derek Carr has had nothing but one coaching and OC change after another, and usually cursed with a bad defense. It's a team sport. Fans simplify it to just the QB for their own convenience. It's easy.

Even Tom Brady hasn't won by himself. It's no coincidence that he had coaching continuity, and a top 10 defense, for years at New England.

Tom Brady has done a lot with nothing so has Rodgers, I disagree with this. When you're responsible for the highest paid player on the team, your play needs to be better. Just as a mod, when they pay you 5 million and pay ksk 12 dollars, the expectation is that you'll be doing more!!!!

 

[Section446]

Should have traded him two years ago, it's obvious that he's not the guy.

 

[starfan1]

How about for ONCE we see how Dak does with a great defense in the playoffs?

He's never had that, and neither did Tony Romo. That's usually what it takes to win a Super Bowl.

And he still don’t