Dak should carry this offense

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,836
Reaction score
34,988
So Dak sucks because he was killing it on 3rd and long.

But Zeke’s good because he was pure garbage due to the Vikings selling out to stop the run.

Hahahahahahahahahahha

*Smiles and nods politely*

Apparent you think Zeke sucks, but the Vikings don’t, to throw point they were content enough to wait for him to blow an RPO and throw a check did. to Zeke on a fourth down when they finally went two safeties.
 

MikeB80

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,870
Reaction score
7,392
Last night was the type of game that our last QB was defended for carrying the team and not having any help from the running game or defense. Dak doesn't get the same treatment from the never-Dakers. They are too entrenched in their agenda. They have to keep up their online Dak trolling persona.

I don't have any bad feelings of dak. he is fine. To me he is a capable quarterback who can win in the right situation which is basically every qb sans a few with ridiculous skills.

having said that Romo was hated locally and naitonally from day one, Dak has been worshipped since day one.

When Dallas couldn't score to beat denver in the redzone in 2009 or new england in 2011 etc. Romo was crucified. Not garrett or austin or dez but Romo.

Dak does not get the same treatment. It's always the coach, the expensive running back etc. His honeymoon hasn't ended yet and he is lucky to have Garrett as the villain currently. Hopefully he will not have Garrett in that role and he will succeed with a new coach next year.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
It’s so spot on that the Vikings think Zeke sucks as their game plan was clearly set to stop Dak, not Zeke..

And they did it easily.

Our game plan was the same. Stop cooks and he made us look like chumps. A total explosive back vs a turd.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
16,969
Apparent you think Zeke sucks, but the Vikings don’t, to throw point they were content enough to wait for him to blow an RPO and throw a check did. to Zeke on a fourth down when they finally went two safeties.
Is this English? Sorry, I don’t know what a “throw point” or a “check did” is.




*Smiles and nods politely*

“His biggest haters still won’t admit that because they’re mouth-breathing trash, but this isn’t meant for them. We can smile and nod politely at them as an official stance.”
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,836
Reaction score
34,988
Zeke is a POWER back that initiated contact and wears down defenses. He’s not like Cook.

Your the type of guys that think Barkley is better because of one flashy run the whole game, while nettig 1 YPC consistently the rest of the way, while by the second half, Dak is literally sitting back there all day to throw, because Zeke literally is like a workhorse that constantly puts pressure on the DL. Even when defending the Giants, teams generally play two safeties.

Then you guys say dumb things like Pollard can do the same things Zeke does.
 

Tommy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,212
Reaction score
2,972
This post is completely stupid. You claimed Dak should be given the keys, because we overpaid a clown RB that underperforms, yet the Vikings game plan was completely set on stopping Zeke and the Vikings were content ALL NIGHT with one safety and putting a second year safety on Cooper all night long in man coverage, with their starting CB out.


Dak’s major yardage all came on third and longs, when the OL gave him all day to throw, while our WRs were running in around in man coverage, running deep routes. The following is from the second quarter alone. Cooper on a 3rd and 12 for 20, Gallup for 15 on 3rd and 12, Jarwin for 26 on 3rd and 3, Cobb for 22 on third and 7.

Th Vikings rarely blitzed on third and when they brought a basic blitz, our OL completely stone walled them.

even Jerry Jones, drunk could see It:




yes, your poost was ridiculous absurd. The moment Vikings went two safeties, Dak took the checkdown to Zeke on a fourth down blowing the game.
Good post but forget about trying to make this a real football conversation.

1. Nav22 is in an emotional tailspin
2. He doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,836
Reaction score
34,988
And they did it easily.

Our game plan was the same. Stop cooks and he made us look like chumps. A total explosive back vs a turd.

We pretty much play two safeties standard in pass formations. Dak probably sees more single safety high than any other starting QB in the league. Even Goff sees way more cover 2.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
16,969
Good post but forget about trying to make this a real football conversation.

1. Nav22 is in an emotional tailspin
2. He doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about.
*Smiles and nods politely*



“His biggest haters still won’t admit that because they’re mouth-breathing trash, but this isn’t meant for them. We can smile and nod politely at them as an official stance.”
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
16,969
Zeke is a POWER back that initiated contact and wears down defenses. He’s not like Cook.

Your the type of guys that think Barkley is better because of one flashy run the whole game, while betting 1 YPC consistently the rest of the way, while by the second half, Dak is literally sitting back there all day to throw, because Zeke literally is like a workhorse that constantly puts pressure on the DL.

Then you guys say dumb things like Pollaed can do the same things Zeke does.
Hahahhahhahahhahhahahhaaha

Yeah, Zeke was awesome last night. Dak’s success was solely because of Zeke “wearing down” the Vikings!





*Smiles and nods politely*

“His biggest haters still won’t admit that because they’re mouth-breathing trash, but this isn’t meant for them. We can smile and nod politely at them as an official stance.”
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,417
Reaction score
94,411
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
*Smiles and nods politely*



“His biggest haters still won’t admit that because they’re mouth-breathing trash, but this isn’t meant for them. We can smile and nod politely at them as an official stance.”
Dak played exceptionally well last night, but khiladi has a good point that it would have been much more difficult if the Vikings weren't going all in to stop Zeke.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,542
Reaction score
26,945
wrong Zekes was so much of the focus it opened up the Passing game.. sorry you dont understand that and in last nights loss , sure Dak showed he can make all the throws.. wasn't on dak or zeke

BAD DEFENSE and few oddball play calls.. you dont need to tear down Zeke to compliment Dak but when you do it makes you a football sports Idiot.. the Vikes game planned to be sure they put all their effort into stopping the run , left a lot of Man to man for the WRs and or the most part we took advantage except the last 2 drives.. the RPOs should have been pulled away from zeke and passed or Dak run but the WRs were open all night because of a threat like Zeke..

but IMo as bad as our un game was most of it was the oline but this was not an offensive issue , its was bead defense, some bad play calls late, and ST gaffs...


you know Zeke and Dak are DC teammates? why is one have to be bad for the other to succeed, they wont tell you this, nor will the coaches, teammates and around the league.. Zekes very important to this offense regardless of stats..

Lastly you are fan not coach and your opinion on how the offense is run wont get to the DC staff so...lol its all for not
 

Cmac

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,162
Reaction score
8,148
New eye prescription and muting Orlando Scandrick might help some on this board.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
16,969
Dak played exceptionally well last night, but khiladi has a good point that it would have been much more difficult if the Vikings weren't going all in to stop Zeke.
That’s funny. The narrative used to be that if you stopped Zeke, Dak couldn’t beat you.

Now that Dak has killed that theory, we’re supposed to discredit Dak BECAUSE they geared up to stop Zeke???
:lmao2:

So what happens when teams play 2 deep and Zeke starts running well again?

Answer: the mouth-breathing TRASH will go back to saying that Zeke is carrying Dak and “Dak sux!”
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
16,969
wrong Zekes was so much of the focus it opened up the Passing game.. sorry you dont understand that and in last nights loss , sure Dak showed he can make all the throws.. wasn't on dak or zeke

BAD DEFENSE and few oddball play calls.. you dont need to tear down Zeke to compliment Dak but when you do it makes you a football sports Idiot.. the Vikes game planned to be sure they put all their effort into stopping the run , left a lot of Man to man for the WRs and or the most part we took advantage except the last 2 drives.. the RPOs should have been pulled away from zeke and passed or Dak run but the WRs were open all night because of a threat like Zeke..

but IMo as bad as our un game was most of it was the oline but this was not an offensive issue , its was bead defense, some bad play calls late, and ST gaffs...


you know Zeke and Dak are DC teammates? why is one have to be bad for the other to succeed, they wont tell you this, nor will the coaches, teammates and around the league.. Zekes very important to this offense regardless of stats..

Lastly you are fan not coach and your opinion on how the offense is run wont get to the DC staff so...lol its all for not
Sorry, I can’t decipher this uneducated gobbledygook. Go get your GED.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,417
Reaction score
94,411
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
That’s funny. The narrative used to be that if you stopped Zeke, Dak couldn’t beat you.

Now that Dak has killed that theory, we’re supposed to discredit Dak BECAUSE they geared up to stop Zeke???
:lmao2:

So what happens when teams play 2 deep and Zeke starts running well again?

Answer: the mouth-breathing TRASH will go back to saying that Zeke is carrying Dak and “Dak sux!”
How did Dak discredit that theory? He lost.

BTW, I didn't discredit Dak. I specifically said he played exceptionally well.
 

Cmac

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,162
Reaction score
8,148
I think some have been listening to Skip Bayless' wishy washy analysis. QBR King!
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
16,969
How did Dak discredit that theory? He lost.

BTW, I didn't discredit Dak. I specifically said he played exceptionally well.
Dak was the only reason we had any chance to win. That’s how.

You didn’t try to discredit Dak, but the mouth-breathing trash in this thread certainly did.
 
Top