75boyz
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,973
- Reaction score
- 10,904
If you guys can't support Rush, find another team.
Yep.
Such Rush Trolls I tell ya.
If you guys can't support Rush, find another team.
You can’t have a QB competing for their job during the season. We stayed with the hot hand and it was the right decision. Jimmy Johnson did the same thing in 1991 after Troy Aikman was ready to return from injury. Jimmy stayed with Steve Beuerlein into the playoffs who led the Cowboys to five straight wins. Bill Belichick stayed with Tom Brady when Drew Bledsoe was ready to return. You don’t bench a hot hand at QB!
Romo was toast physically.All of the coaches, owners, and players are defending Dak. In 2016, ownership was being very coy about the situation. I understand 13-3 is an impressive stat, but telling Romo that he can't even compete for the starting job is absolutely ridiculous.
This organization has actually done a good job at given Dak what he needs to be successful: great wrs, great rb, a good to great offensive line throughout most of his tenure and now a top level defense.
I do not believe Cooper Rush is a better quarterback than Dak Prescott. However, I think this coaching staff seems to manage the game better with Cooper at the helm. My hope is when Dak comes back, he sees how lucky he is that he still has that job because his opportunities are thinning out.
Lol, sticking with Dak was actually one of the dumbest decisions in the history of sports.
The Saints didn't stick with Bridgewater when they went undefeated when he was filling in, and any front office that wasn't completely inept would have done the same thing with the Cowboys.
- Trying to win with a rookie which has never been done before and likely will never be done
- Sticking with the player that had never been in a playoff situation even in college over a QB that had plenty of playoff experience
- Sticking with the obviously inferior player (proven by being too scared to even have a competition for the job)
I'll just leave my last statement as it's funny to see how people hate Romo to the point of idiocy.
BS... the hit he took in that preseason game would have sidelined any qb.Romo's back was being held together with twine and bobby pins.
And everyone on the team knew it.
Romo was toast physically.
BS... the hit he took in that preseason game would have sidelined any qb.
It was the right decision? It clearly wasn't when you have one of the key pieces of the 2016 season saying youth is the reason they failed in the playoffs.
KJJ again, going on for pages when he's wrong. Tradition.
Who was the key piece who said we failed in 2016 because of youth? Two of our best players that season were rookies. We failed because of our defense couldn’t contain Aaron Rodgers.
He played one series in a meaningless season finale game. It’s funny you would say he was our best chance for a Super Bowl when his playoff record was 2-4 and we never even won a divisional round game with him. Dak had been the starting QB the entire season and led us to that 13-3 record. It would’ve been absolutely foolish to bench him and go back to where we had already been with Romo, who’s had his share of failures in the playoffs. The playoff loss that season to Green Bay wasn’t because of Dak. That game was going to OT until our defense choked in the final seconds.
Jeebus ...... Then why did he retire? Why can't he even play golf without doing back stretching exercises in the middle of the grass at 41 years old.
Give me a break with your BS crap
I do not underestimate the effect of that injury in SEA in a pretend game. It was evident to me that Romo could no longer adequately protect himself.
I would like to think they intervened on his behalf because it was apparent that he would keep going back out there until he did some permanent damage to himself.
He was a warrior and left it all out on the field but I didn't want to see him crumpled on the turf again.
Not sure how many more times we are going to beat this dead horse, resurrect it, then beat it again!! But, as I have said in the past, Tony deserved to get his job back. If I was the coach, I would have said to Tony, "Ok, here's the deal. We're going to put you back in as starter, BUT, if at any time we feel you're struggling or have another setback from injury, we're going with Dak all the way". Not sure why this was not even a possibility. And that's all I want to say about that.
Elliott. He outright said they were more prepared their second time round to the playoffs because the nerves were gone and they had experience. You're wrong. You will stay wrong. But even though you're wrong, you'll spin and annoy everyone around you for pages rather than just saying "Yeah, okay, you're right". Same crap in a different thread on a different day with you.
Same as that Ronnie dude when it comes to Zeke threads. It's embarrassing.
In spite of the stats, Dak didn't play well for portions of the game. There were many drives that came up empty because of Dak. (The same could be said for the loss to the Rams) That GB defense was terrible, especially the pass defense.
The Cowboys didn't have the defense to go all the way, but they had the offense to beat up on teams like GB. The experienced vet, with the huge chip on his shoulder would have beaten up on the GB defense and it wouldn't have come down to a last second FG.