Actually, the OP of this entire thread simply posted the statistical data. It didn’t state a hypothesis or concept beyond that. So maybe you’re the one that needs things dumbed down for you.
That statistical data didn’t mesh with your agenda, so you then made up some stupid BS to try and explain away the numbers, without actually posting any proof behind your assertion.
Again, the numbers are what they are, you then made a hypothesis trying to discredit the numbers without any proof to back it up. You were called out on it, and again provided no proof for your hypothesis.
You also call into question the methods use to create the statistics, without actually knowing anything about the techniques used to gather the data. Yet you try to preach to others about logic.