Dak vs. Hurts

[America's Cowboy]

You shouldn't be lecturing anyone on being fair and impartial.

Yes, we had some issues talent wise around him (which I have pointed out ad nauseum dating back to August camp when I argued with people Jerry didn't do enough at WR). But also, Dak was brutal in that San Fran game and you can't blame that on not having enough WRs. He was brutal mostly on his own. You seem to think it can't be both. So LOL at you trying chastise people for being biased. You literally spend all your time on this board making excuses for Dak.

Not excuses. Facts. You Dak haters simply can't handle facts because your feelings get hurt. Here is a fact that doesn't care about anyone's feelings but is based on purely fact: Dak is going to remain the Cowboys franchise QB for several more years to come, and he's going to remain the starter because he gives the Cowboys the best chance to win with what they've got. Let's see if you can handle those facts.

 

[America's Cowboy]

O line is what makes the difference.

100% agreed.

 

[bottleKids]

And so will the Eagles. For the worst.

If he gets “market value” he will become a anchor to that franchise.

Sounds familiar

 

[McKDaddy]

Dak could be similar to hurts if he was as mobile as he was in 2016.
Sadly since the injury he seems to not be capable of running much or as effectively

He never had the burst though. The thing that separates Hurts and some of these other guys is you can have guys all around them & they have the burst to escape. Dak is very slow to get up to speed. Why he gets caught so many times when it looks like he has a big opening.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Not a single GM would take prime Dak over prime Romo.

Except Dumb (JJ) and Dumber (Garrett).

LOL...Yeah, so many would prefer the QB who threw for double the amount of INTs and fumbles in almost the same amount of games played, yet couldn't put up better playoff numbers or accomplishment. Oh, and went Hollywood during his young and healthy prime years.

 

[McKDaddy]

jalen has 0 wins vs dak.
since his arrival into the league...dak owns the east.

its a team game when your QB loses but its individual if they win?

 

[CATCH17]

Beg him to throw.

Seemed to not work. He had a QB rating of 101.5 this year and only threw 2 picks. They were arguably the best offense in the NFL and you don't get that with a mediocre QB.

This idea that all he does is make 1 read and throw the ball is funny. Again, the level of criticism of Hurts is simply because he's an Eagle. He was great this year. We'll see what next year brings.

Yeah you see the numbers and results. You look past how it’s being done.

That’s the difference between people like me and you.

It wouldn’t matter to me if Hurts was an Eagle or not. I’m looking at the system he runs to be successful.

Dak is better than Hurts and I think Dak is completely mediocre.

I would also take Hurts and his contract over Dak his contract.

 

[CATCH17]

its a team game when your QB loses but its individual if they win?

Hurts is playing a team game.

Mahomes is playing a carry the team on my back game.

That’s the difference.

 

[McKDaddy]

Just a reminder, Dak is still a Dallas Cowboy and still your QB.

No, he's the Cowboys QB but he is NOT my QB. I'm just waiting til the day he's gone.

 

[Cowboysheelsreds058]

We've had 3 All-Pro linemen on the O-line at the same time and couldn't win a single playoff game.

Dak is the problem and there's not an o-line you could build to make him successful. He will find a way to fail.

This, What about 2016 our whole OL was the best in the game, about like the Emmit vs Barry debate, where the Barry fans says, well if Barry had the boys OL. What? He had 2 Pro Bowlers himself. Lol

 

[America's Cowboy]

No, he's the Cowboys QB but he is NOT my QB. I'm just waiting til the day he's gone.

He's your QB whether you like it or not.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

This, What about 2016 our whole OL was the best in the game, about like the Emmit vs Barry debate, where the Barry fans says, well if Barry had the boys OL. What? He had 2 Pro Bowlers himself. Lol

We had 3 first team all-pros on the line in 2016 and a RB that won the rushing title by over 300 yards.

Dak is a loser on the football field and will always find a way to lose.

 

[SultanOfSix]

LOL...Yeah, so many would prefer the QB who threw for double the amount of INTs and fumbles in almost the same amount of games played, yet couldn't put up better playoff numbers or accomplishment. Oh, and went Hollywood during his young and healthy prime years.

When Dak played "aggressive" (a keyword for him that most very good QBs do ALL THE TIME), he threw the most INTs in the league despite playing in five less games.

And you're still on this "going Hollywood" tripe? This isn't Entertainment Tonight. Dak has more commercials and sponsorships than Tony ever did.

 

[RFABR]

His offense scored 35 and marched the field almost at will, but the D couldn't stop Reid/Mahomes.

We saw the opposite in our game.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

No, he's the Cowboys QB but he is NOT my QB. I'm just waiting til the day he's gone.

This is why Cowboys fans should be rooting for Dak to be horrible.

Dak needs to be so bad that even Jerry can't justify putting him on the field.

The QB position needs to be taken seriously.

AC would've said "We don't need Mahomes! Alex Smith just got us to the playoffs and you want a new QB?!?! You don't know football!!!!"

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

When Dak played "aggressive" (a keyword for him that most very good QBs do ALL THE TIME), he threw the most INTs in the league despite playing in five less games.

And you're still on this "going Hollywood" tripe? This isn't Entertainment Tonight. Dak has more commercials and sponsorships than Tony ever did.

The funny thing is Dak is wayyyyy more Hollywood than Romo ever was, but AC still harps on that like it means something.

Dak and Romo both are losers on the football field.

 

[mardwin]

They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.

You are not making the argument you think you are making. Hurts scored 35 points... Dak scores 35 points against the Niners and Dallas wins that game.

 

[America's Cowboy]

When Dak played "aggressive" (like most very good QBs do all the time), he threw the most INTs in the league despite playing in five less games.

And you're still on this "going Hollywood" tripe? This isn't Entertainment Tonight. Dak has more commercials and sponsorships than Tony ever did.

At least 1/3rd of Dak's INTs this year were strictly on the receivers. That's not including the horrible play designs/concepts, lack of weapons and amongst the worst Olines in the league when it came to QB pressures and pass block win rate.

Want to try again?

 

[USArmyVet]

LOL...Yeah, so many would prefer the QB who threw for double the amount of INTs and fumbles in almost the same amount of games played, yet couldn't put up better playoff numbers or accomplishment. Oh, and went Hollywood during his young and healthy prime years.

Romo 150 games played 117 int's 62 fumbles

Dak 97 games played 65 int's 52 fumbles

So Romo had 179 int's/fumbles (not all fumbles turned over) compared to Dak's 117 int's/fumbles.......so how is that double and how is 150 games compared to 97 games "...almost the same amount of games played"??????

Yet again we have emotions creating false facts so as to try and prove a non-point.

 

[USArmyVet]

At least 1/3rd of Dak's INTs this year were strictly on the receivers. That's not including the horrible play designs/concepts, lack of weapons and amongst the worst Olines in the league when it came to QB pressures and pass block win rate.

Want to try again?

So how many of Romo's INT's were on receivers and the horrible play designs/concepts, lack of weapons, and bad o-line????? So Dak has excuses but Romo doesn't in your world?