Dak vs. Hurts

acr731 said:
Who the hell is a flippin Romo diehard? The man hasn't played since 2016. You're the only one who even talks about him any more. Anyone who is critical of Dak, there you are front and center calling that person a Romo lover. Geebus, man, find some new material.
Click to expand...
BooHooHoo...the only who denies he's a Romo diehard but gets his panties in a bunch when one brings up Romo. LOL. You fool no one.
 
jterrell said:
ROFL. My dude the funble went th eother way for a fumble 6. Yes, it was game changing.
It kept the Chiefs in the game in the 1st half.

All that said Hurts was really good aside from showing he lacked any arm at all on deep heaves.
Having a max distance of 45 yards is a tough road to hoe for an NFL QB.
Click to expand...
The OP mentioned the fumble cost the team, if that's the case then any error could be deemed costly.
Unlike Dak, Hurts made up for his error, which included a 75 yard drive for a TD and 2 pt, with less than 6 min to go....that's the difference, one comes back from his error whereas after the second INT vrs 9ers Dak capitulated.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
The one you lost and I won.

That one.

Point proven. Move along.
Click to expand...
I remember who almost had a bet but the injury clause kicked in and it was null and void.


Do I have to post a definition of those words for you?
 
Ken said:
I remember who almost had a bet but the injury clause kicked in and it was null and void.


Do I have to post a definition of those words for you?
Click to expand...
Post whatever you want.

My point is still proven over and over and over.
 
America's Cowboy said:
BooHooHoo...the only who denies he's a Romo diehard but gets his panties in a bunch when one brings up Romo. LOL. You fool no one.
Click to expand...
Because you're like a broken record with it. It isn't just me, you call EVERYONE who criticizes Dak a Romo lover.

Romo and your boy Dak both equally suck....
 
acr731 said:
Because you're like a broken record with it. It isn't just me, you call EVERYONE who criticizes Dak a Romo lover.

Romo and your boy Dak both equally suck....
Click to expand...
LOL. Dak's time isn't fully written yet. He still has 3 more playing years to go to have a fair amount of time comparison to Romo.
 
CowboyoWales said:
The OP mentioned the fumble cost the team, if that's the case then any error could be deemed costly.
Unlike Dak, Hurts made up for his error, which included a 75 yard drive for a TD and 2 pt, with less than 6 min to go....that's the difference, one comes back from his error whereas after the second INT vrs 9ers Dak capitulated.
Click to expand...
This has zero to do with Dak.

If any player fumbles into a fumble-6 it is VERY costly. In a game decided with seconds left it is obviously more critical.

Hurts was really good all day but that play was insanely costly. With the way Hurts played had he not fumbled that into a Chiefs TD, the game would have literally been over at halftime.
The Chiefs only had a handful of 2nd half possessions.

If Dak was QBing that Eagles team yesterday they probably win by 10.
Outside QB and TE I am not sure the Chiefs had an advantage in any other position on the field.

Hurts is a good player but anyone who actually watches QBs saw limitations yesterday.
 
StarOfGlory said:
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
Click to expand...
That's my issue with Dak, he keeps making the same bonehead plays over and over and over again!
His pick sixes and INTs at the end of the season were inexcusible.
 
StarOfGlory said:
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
Click to expand...
They have something else in common. One of the worst throws to end a playoff game. Hurts final throw was really ugly. It looked as if he threw it with his weak arm. I laughed, Sunday was a good day for me.
 
jterrell said:
This has zero to do with Dak.

If any player fumbles into a fumble-6 it is VERY costly. In a game decided with seconds left it is obviously more critical.

Hurts was really good all day but that play was insanely costly. With the way Hurts played had he not fumbled that into a Chiefs TD, the game would have literally been over at halftime.
The Chiefs only had a handful of 2nd half possessions.

If Dak was QBing that Eagles team yesterday they probably win by 10.
Outside QB and TE I am not sure the Chiefs had an advantage in any other position on the field.

Hurts is a good player but anyone who actually watches QBs saw limitations yesterday.
Click to expand...
So, this has 'zero to do with Dak' and then you turn it into Dak.
Dak would have done the same thing he tends to do when face with adversity, hides.
 
StarOfGlory said:
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
Click to expand...
LOL............ironic. I knew the trolls would blame Dak for an early fumble saying he cost them the SB, but to say Hurts did is just laughable.

Some of you fans will just never understand football. OR just be too QB challenged to even understand the concept of team and football.

Hurts was other worldly out there. Even a fluke fumble for a TD didnt tarnish his day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 127 more.
Total: 7,954 (members: 227, guests: 7,727)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,152
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top