Dak vs. Hurts

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,731
Reaction score
50,195
Who the hell is a flippin Romo diehard? The man hasn't played since 2016. You're the only one who even talks about him any more. Anyone who is critical of Dak, there you are front and center calling that person a Romo lover. Geebus, man, find some new material.
BooHooHoo...the only who denies he's a Romo diehard but gets his panties in a bunch when one brings up Romo. LOL. You fool no one.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,518
Reaction score
4,756
ROFL. My dude the funble went th eother way for a fumble 6. Yes, it was game changing.
It kept the Chiefs in the game in the 1st half.

All that said Hurts was really good aside from showing he lacked any arm at all on deep heaves.
Having a max distance of 45 yards is a tough road to hoe for an NFL QB.
The OP mentioned the fumble cost the team, if that's the case then any error could be deemed costly.
Unlike Dak, Hurts made up for his error, which included a 75 yard drive for a TD and 2 pt, with less than 6 min to go....that's the difference, one comes back from his error whereas after the second INT vrs 9ers Dak capitulated.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
17,366
The one you lost and I won.

That one.

Point proven. Move along.
I remember who almost had a bet but the injury clause kicked in and it was null and void.


Do I have to post a definition of those words for you?
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,456
Reaction score
73,065
I remember who almost had a bet but the injury clause kicked in and it was null and void.


Do I have to post a definition of those words for you?
Post whatever you want.

My point is still proven over and over and over.
 

acr731

Jerry learned to GM from Pee Wee Herman
Messages
10,117
Reaction score
28,072
BooHooHoo...the only who denies he's a Romo diehard but gets his panties in a bunch when one brings up Romo. LOL. You fool no one.
Because you're like a broken record with it. It isn't just me, you call EVERYONE who criticizes Dak a Romo lover.

Romo and your boy Dak both equally suck....
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,731
Reaction score
50,195
Because you're like a broken record with it. It isn't just me, you call EVERYONE who criticizes Dak a Romo lover.

Romo and your boy Dak both equally suck....
LOL. Dak's time isn't fully written yet. He still has 3 more playing years to go to have a fair amount of time comparison to Romo.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,859
Reaction score
15,962
The OP mentioned the fumble cost the team, if that's the case then any error could be deemed costly.
Unlike Dak, Hurts made up for his error, which included a 75 yard drive for a TD and 2 pt, with less than 6 min to go....that's the difference, one comes back from his error whereas after the second INT vrs 9ers Dak capitulated.
This has zero to do with Dak.

If any player fumbles into a fumble-6 it is VERY costly. In a game decided with seconds left it is obviously more critical.

Hurts was really good all day but that play was insanely costly. With the way Hurts played had he not fumbled that into a Chiefs TD, the game would have literally been over at halftime.
The Chiefs only had a handful of 2nd half possessions.

If Dak was QBing that Eagles team yesterday they probably win by 10.
Outside QB and TE I am not sure the Chiefs had an advantage in any other position on the field.

Hurts is a good player but anyone who actually watches QBs saw limitations yesterday.
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
39,688
Reaction score
44,897
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
That's my issue with Dak, he keeps making the same bonehead plays over and over and over again!
His pick sixes and INTs at the end of the season were inexcusible.
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,457
Reaction score
11,571
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
They have something else in common. One of the worst throws to end a playoff game. Hurts final throw was really ugly. It looked as if he threw it with his weak arm. I laughed, Sunday was a good day for me.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,518
Reaction score
4,756
This has zero to do with Dak.

If any player fumbles into a fumble-6 it is VERY costly. In a game decided with seconds left it is obviously more critical.

Hurts was really good all day but that play was insanely costly. With the way Hurts played had he not fumbled that into a Chiefs TD, the game would have literally been over at halftime.
The Chiefs only had a handful of 2nd half possessions.

If Dak was QBing that Eagles team yesterday they probably win by 10.
Outside QB and TE I am not sure the Chiefs had an advantage in any other position on the field.

Hurts is a good player but anyone who actually watches QBs saw limitations yesterday.
So, this has 'zero to do with Dak' and then you turn it into Dak.
Dak would have done the same thing he tends to do when face with adversity, hides.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
LOL............ironic. I knew the trolls would blame Dak for an early fumble saying he cost them the SB, but to say Hurts did is just laughable.

Some of you fans will just never understand football. OR just be too QB challenged to even understand the concept of team and football.

Hurts was other worldly out there. Even a fluke fumble for a TD didnt tarnish his day.
 
Top