Twitter: Dak's Efficiency Is Trending The Wrong Way

[Ken]

So you think Rodgers and his SEVEN combined INTs and Fumbles are the same as Dak and his TWENTY FOUR combined INTS and Fumbles?

And you sit here and actually type out "Dak had comparable numbers to the MVP" without actually looking stuff up, huh?

I think Rodgers 1 and done in the playoffs are exactly the same as Dak's.

 

[mattjames2010]

"Imagine being like 40+ years old and still typing like this. What's going on, big guy?"

Oh! The IRONY!!!

Weren't you that 50+ year old that used to follow me around on the boards because you lost a debate with me? I forgot to put you on ignore.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

I think Rodgers 1 and done in the playoffs are exactly the same as Dak's.

Are you proud of that? Because you act like it.

 

[mattjames2010]

I think Rodgers 1 and done in the playoffs are exactly the same as Dak's.

Yeah, Dak's right on the level with an MVP and future HOF that also has a Super Bowl ring he got within the first 3 years of starting simply because he lost to the 49ers the same as Dak.

 

[Dre11]

So you think Rodgers and his SEVEN combined INTs and Fumbles are the same as Dak and his TWENTY FOUR combined INTS and Fumbles?

And you sit here and actually type out "Dak had comparable numbers to the MVP" without actually looking stuff up, huh?

Yes he has comparable numbers you actually searched for 1 stat and claim the numbers aren't comparable so pathetic.. I could point out Dak has more yards, more yards a game..lol

 

[Dre11]

Yeah, Dak's right on the level with an MVP and future HOF that also has a Super Bowl ring he got within the first 3 years of starting simply because he lost to the 49ers the same as Dak.

Rodgers been in the league 16 Years Dak been in 6, his career hasn't been defined yet.. lol

 

[mattjames2010]

Rodgers been in the league 16 Years Dak been in 6, his career hasn't been defined yet.. lol

When has 6 years of starting not meant something? He's a veteran now and we know his tendencies.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Yes he has comparable numbers you actually searched for 1 stat and claim the numbers aren't comparable so pathetic.. I could point out Dak has more yards, more yards a game..lol

Yes, because Dak's 300 more passing yards was much more impactful than Rodgers and his 17 less INTs and fumbles.

Do you have no shame at all?

 

[Dre11]

When has 6 years of starting not meant something? He's a veteran now and we know his tendencies.

Again 6 years in he has years to go to get that 1 ring Rodgers has in 16

 

[Dre11]

Yes, because Dak's 300 more passing yards was much more impactful than Rodgers and his 17 less INTs and fumbles.

Do you have no shame at all?

The numbers are comparable...lol
Watching you trying to discount them is shameful for you. Is it not?...lol

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

The numbers are comparable...lol
Watching you trying to discount them is shameful for you. Is it not?...lol

Are the turnovers comparable? Are turnovers not really important?

If so I would LOVEEEEE to see you compare them.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

So what? What has Dak's personal stats done for the team? How have they provided post season success?

My dude, it's literally all they've got lol

 

[Dre11]

So what? What has Dak's personal stats done for the team? How have they provided post season success?

The same thing all the other players stats did for the team, they were 12-5. Which is why it's a team game not a 1 person team as you and your friend think

 

[Dre11]

Are the turnovers comparable? Are turnovers not really important?

If so I would LOVEEEEE to see you compare them.

Are all the other numbers comparable, are the other number not important? You seem to think 1 set of numbers are important..asinine...lol

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

This coming from this site's biggest Dak hater?

Untwist them. The stats are from a third party. You know what third party is, don't you? It is like when Dak decides to run with 14 seconds left because he is a free spirit.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Wrong link

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Are all the other numbers comparable, are the other number not important? You seem to think 1 set of numbers are important..asinine...lol

All numbers are not created equal.

You're talking like a defeated person that just don't know when to quit now.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

The same thing all the other players stats did for the team, they were 12-5. Which is why it's a team game not a 1 person team as you and your friend think

The Cowboys with Dak was 11-6 this year.

Do you research anything at all before you type?

 

[Dre11]

Here's the resident troll...must be on recess...lol

 

[Dre11]

All numbers are not created equal.

You're talking like a defeated person that just don't know when to quit now.

Lol numbers are numbers. How about #1 offense led by Dak.