Twitter: Dak's Efficiency Is Trending The Wrong Way

[Dre11]

The Cowboys with Dak was 11-6 this year.

Do you research anything at all before you type?

Do you research, Dak had 16 turnovers not 24 .we can play this game all night.

 

[charron]

If you see Dak for what he is your a hater. If you love Dak for whatever reason you can't stand anything that doesn't fit the love fest narrative. This board is just too funny.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Do you research, Dak had 16 turnovers not 24 .we can play this game all night.

Ya might wanna go back and read my post.

I said Dak had 24 combined fumbles and INT.

Prove that wrong.

 

[Dre11]

If you see Dak for what he is your a hater. If you love Dak for whatever reason you can't stand anything that doesn't fit the love fest narrative. This board is just too funny.

I.dont see anyone expecting any love fest, we see folks alling him less than what he is, and have the right to dispute it, just like the other side.

 

[Dre11]

Ya might wanna go back and read my post.

I said Dak had 24 combined fumbles and INT.

Prove that wrong.

And in the next post called them turnovers.
Did you not?

Proven wrong...lol

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

And in the next post called them turnovers.
Did you not?

Proven wrong...lol

This was the next post:

Yes, because Dak's 300 more passing yards was much more impactful than Rodgers and his 17 less INTs and fumbles.

Do you have no shame at all?

You really have no shame, do ya?

 

[Dre11]

This was the next post:

This in reference to the fumbles/int combined

You really have no shame, do ya?

"Are the turnovers comparable? Are turnovers not really important?"

If so I would LOVEEEEE to see you compare them.


DID YOU NOT POST THIS...LOL


THE SHANE IS ON YOU...LOL

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

"Are the turnovers comparable? Are turnovers not really important?"

If so I would LOVEEEEE to see you compare them.


DID YOU NOT POST THIS...LOL


THE SHANE IS ON YOU...LOL

Yes, I posted that, but you notice that I did not bring up any numbers, right? Because the numbers I posted are correct, but not all the fumbles count as turnovers. That's why I worded it "INTS and fumbles" instead of "turnovers".

I am calculated in what I say. I think before I type. Man, I am good aren't I? Always a few steps ahead.

 

[Dre11]

Yes, I posted that, but you notice that I did not bring up any numbers, right? Because the numbers I posted are correct, but not all the fumbles count as turnovers. That's why I worded it "INTS and fumbles" instead of "turnovers".

I am calculated in what I say. I think before I type. Man, I am good aren't I? Always a few steps ahead.

You called them turnovers, you were referring to the post involving the numbers you posted, gtfoh
Backtracking doesn't look good on you...lol
Just admit you got hemmed up...lol

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

You called them turnovers, you were referring to the post involving the numbers you posted, gtfoh
Backtracking doesn't look good on you...lol

Show me where I mentioned those numbers and turnovers in the same post.

If you can't then you have to delete your account. Deal?

 

[pansophy]

An unknown?

He has 80k followers and is a contributor for The Athletic. What's your credentials for all the horrible memes you post?

Also, If you think he's put out false numbers then prove them wrong.

All the data posted show a lot of variability -- it's not just Dak. I'm not sure I would put much stock in the direction the line happens to be pointing as a Dak-specific indicator of anything.

 

[Dre11]

Show me where I mentioned those numbers and turnovers in the same post.

If you can't then you have to delete your account. Deal?

I don't have to prove you put them in the same account. You asked a question using turnovers in ref to your post of 24 combined fumbles and int its clear you were calling them turnovers....weak

 

[G2]

Oh look! An original thread concept, completely different angles.

Nope, JK, it's the same lame BS and "fans" pissing on a player of the team they're allegedly a "fan" of.
Makes so much sense! Time well spent!

 

[Dre11]

Oh look! An original thread concept, completely different angles.

Nope, JK, it's the same lame BS and "fans" pissing on a player of the team they're allegedly a "fan" of.
Makes so much sense! Time well spent!

The op got 3 thread on the first page. They all are on the qb....lol

 

[Qcard]

Lol numbers are numbers. How about #1 offense led by Dak.

It doesn't count because Cooper Rush started a game and could win at the same rate like Andy Dalton

 

[Qcard]

By OP dumb logic....

Carson Wentz's Efficiency is trending Up (better thrower ask @Risen Star )

Jared Goff's Efficiency sky rocketed and was stable throughout

Ignore the Win Loss Records Cooper Rush won with Tony Romo's team too...

 

[Diehardblues]

The op got 3 thread on the first page. They all are on the qb....lol

And he’ll keep creating them inciting your responses if y’all don’t stop feeding him. Ignore them and they’ll all fall off the front page quickly,

 

[Qcard]

And he’ll keep creating them inciting your responses if y’all don’t stop feeding him.

Ignore them and they’ll all fall off the front page quickly,

Nope....I LOVE exposing Dak Haters underbelly....so soft

 

[Diehardblues]

Nope....I LOVE exposing Dak Haters underbelly....so soft

They are already exposed. The response or taking the bait means the troll wins.

 

[Qcard]

They are already exposed. The response or taking the bait means the troll wins.

Nope....Real Dallas Cowboys fans win. 12 - 6 with Division Title after 2020 year is a trend in the right direction.

I treated Dak Haters like feces from day one....If you guys follow my lead, eventually we rid Cowboys Nation of the Canceroous Dak Haters.