Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
- Messages
- 37,905
- Reaction score
- 13,804
Joe Rod;2263102 said:I'm more concerned about an emotional letdown after last night. That was one hard fought game.
Me too. And having to go to their place on a short week.
Joe Rod;2263102 said:I'm more concerned about an emotional letdown after last night. That was one hard fought game.
bbgun;2265609 said:My brother-in-law is a rabid Packer fan. If we win, my sis might get a black eye. Decisions decisions ...
*jk about the domestic violence.
Beast_from_East;2265561 said:They barely beat the sorry arse Vikings and they were actually losing 25-24 to the Lions, if I remember correctly, before Kitna started throwing to the wrong color uniforms.
They actually struggled against a pair of winless doormat teams in their first 2 games, they dont exactly strike fear into me.
ABQcowboyJR;2265676 said:I'm not sure how this one will end up. I think that GB will have more offensive success on us because they will run the ball better then philly did. Might open up there offense more i'm not sure. I don't think they will put up as many points but will end up with more rushing yards and more total yards.
Thanks for the info. lol need to do some more homework on the subject.circasurvive;2265706 said:Actually GB will have an awful day rushing. Grant will be very limited due to a sore hamstring. His backup, Brandon Jackson is a great recieving back but cant run the ball. His average last year when he started was 2.5. Last week against Detroit he rushed 7 times for 61 yards. Jackson seems to always have a big game against Detroit but struggles whenever else. Also Center Scott Wells may miss the game and force Jason Spitz to play Center and Daryn Colledge to come off the bench and play Guard. Rookie guard standout at camp Josh Sitton may also miss the game with a knee problem forcing Tony Moll, who is also questionable to play or workhorse Alan Barbre who lacks experience. Packers should have little to no running game.
jobberone;2265708 said:I don't see us having a flat game but its possible. I'm sure they're aware of it but sometimes you lose a little after laying it all out there.
Rodgers is mobile but he's not McNabb. I've been trying to think of a QB who has had his ability and I can't think of one. Young was as fast and I think faster. Elusive but not with his strength. Staubach was different elusive and not the strength. Can you think of anyone. Still Rodgers can hurt you with the run.
We will need to play our best to win. And I do think we will need to attack more. Hopefully Spencer will be more effective.
SacredStar;2265718 said:AJ Hawk likes to blitz and dallas has to keep an eye on him. They have great LB's in Hawk and Barnett. Al Harris is going to be a flag machine again year. he cocsistantly grabs and holds receivers way past the 5 yard mark. Romo should go his way often, just for the flag factor. Woodson has a toe injury, one toe is broken, so he may be limited yet he did get 2 int's with that injury, while also giving up a scoring play in Detroit.
Lurch;2265719 said:Of course he is no McNabb in terms of mobility. Their offense will be harder to stop then you think. They will roll out Rodgers to counter our pass rush to take shots down the field and they will throw slants on us all day. Be prepared for constant 3 step drops. The secondary has to be ready to tackle when they hit them slants. Those receivers are deadly with the YAC.
Spytheweb;2266229 said:You are in trouble against any team that can throw.
Spytheweb;2266229 said:You are in trouble against any team that can throw.
Spytheweb;2266229 said:You are in trouble against any team that can throw.
Spytheweb;2266229 said:You are in trouble against any team that can throw.