Dallas Cowboys’ Kelvin Joseph is a person of interest in Dallas murder investigation

[G2]

So, do you really believe this?

If you do, then you don't understand your rights as a citizen.

An arrest would be considered a seizure, and that would go against the Fourth Amendment: to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

I don't want to argue about it.

The fact is, the people arrested in this case have been charged with the crime of murder. Both of them.

So, they've been arrested and charged.

When was anyone charged? Please provide your expert information suggesting this.
I'm no expert but I have receipts that no one was charged.

 

[America's Cowboy]

I get a sense we're being trolled here, bro.

I'm gonna go grab my tacos.

You're talking to a troll. Another reason not to pay you.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Mr. Gil Brandt was 100% correct! Why don't you follow another team, since you've disrespected one of the founding builders of the Dallas Cowboys who was correct in his information as usual!

If he was correct with his information (he wasn't) and right (again, he wasn't) then why did he issue an apology?

 

[America's Cowboy]

If he was correct with his information (he wasn't) and right (again, he wasn't) then why did he issue an apology?

Because of troll woke crybabies like yourself who were demanding he be fired.

 

[Pass2Run]

Not true.

As a general rule: If you're placed in custody, your "speedy trial" rights typically require the prosecutor to decide charges within 72 hours.
Many states adhere to this 72-hour limit. Sometimes, no charges are filed, and you will be released. There will not be anything on your criminal record, but you will have an arrest record now.

Source: lawfind.com

Semantics.

In this example, police still charge you, the prosecutor, or really it's often a magistrate, can decide to drop them. In Texas, it's commonly referred to as a "judge's card."

Rare.

We're talking about this case. They're not deciding whether to charge anyone in this case, because the DA has accepted the charged.

And for the cops to arrest you, they have to have reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime.

The cops can charge you and a judge or DA can dismiss the charges up front, but that rarely happens.

Anyway, I'm not going to argue over this. If you want to really know how it works, dig a little deeper.

I'm sure you're smarter than to think you can be arrested without cause...

What you're saying here is that the police can charge someone they've arrested and the DA or judge can decide to drop them in a certain amount of time. That's not what I'm arguing. I get that. I'm saying the cops just can't arrest you for no reason. They have to have probable cause you've committed a crime, then charge you with something.

There's all kinds of case law on this kind of thing.

 

[G2]

Too many overly intelligent individuals on this site. They seem to know everything. I wonder the number of skeletons accumulated in their lifetime.

Explain how one can be "overly intelligent."

Do you mean people that are smart enough to avoid drive-bys?

 

[G2]

Semantics.

In this example, police still charge you, the prosecutor, or really it's often a magistrate, can decide to drop them. In Texas, it's commonly referred to as a "judge's card."

Rare.

We're talking about this case. They're not deciding whether to charge anyone in this case, because the DA has accepted the charged.

And for the cops to arrest you, they have to have reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime.

The cops can charge you and a judge or DA can dismiss the charges up front, but that rarely happens.

Anyway, I'm not going to argue over this. If you want to really know how it works, dig a little deeper.

I'm sure you're smarter than to think you can be arrested without cause...

What you're saying here is that the police can charge someone they've arrested and the DA or judge can decide to drop them in a certain amount of time. That's not what I'm arguing. I get that. I'm saying the cops just can't arrest you for no reason. They have to have probable cause you've committed a crime, then charge you with something.

There's all kinds of case law on this kind of thing.

Who was charged?

 

[Captain-Crash]

too bad Charles Manson died, we could get up a write-in campaign to free little charlie, "he didn't kill anybody too".

 

[G2]

too bad Charles Manson died, we could get up a write-in campaign to free little charlie, "he didn't kill anybody too".

He was misunderstood.

 

[tyke1doe]

Semantics.

We're talking about this case. They're not deciding whether to charge anyone in this case, because the DA has accepted the charged.

And for the cops to arrest you, they have to have reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime.

The cops can charge you and a judge or DA can dismiss the charges up front, but that rarely happens.

Anyway, I'm not going to argue over this. If you want to really know how it works, dig a little deeper.

I'm sure you're smarter than to think you can be arrested without cause...

What you're saying here is that the police can charge someone they've arrested and the DA or judge can decide to drop them in a certain amount of time. That's not what I'm arguing. I get that. I'm saying the cops just can't arrest you for no reason. They have to have probable cause you've committed a crime, then charge you with something.

There's all kinds of case law on this kind of thing.

No, it's not semantics. You said if you're arrested that means you're charged.

But you can be arrested and not charged. And it is significant because even though a charge will not appear on your legal record, an arrest remains on your record.

Now, I understand what you're trying to say, but I'm addressing what you actually and initially said, which was incorrect.

Just say you misspoke and prefer to clarify what you meant. We won't think lesser of you.

 

[tyke1doe]

Explain how one can be "overly intelligent."

Do you mean people that are smart enough to avoid drive-bys?

This thread gets "gooder" and "gooder" and funnier and funnier with every page.

 

[Captain-Crash]

He was misunderstood.

he just wanted to be a singer like the beach boys. he has an actual song that can be found by searching.
he didn't kill nobody.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Because of troll woke crybabies like yourself who were demanding he be fired.

So, being respectful to a kid and his family that was tragically killed, instead of speculating about his death and seeming happy that your scouting report about him was correct, is "woke" according to you?

You have major issues and you'd NEVER say this stuff to the family.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

he just wanted to be a singer like the beach boys. he has an actual song that can be found by searching.
he didn't kill nobody.

Guns N Roses actually covered one of his songs lol

 

[Pass2Run]

Because of troll woke crybabies like yourself who were demanding he be fired.

Why are you so salty?

 

[Captain-Crash]

Guns N Roses actually covered one of his songs lol

he couldn't help these drugged-out freaks who went out and killed people on their own.

 

[G2]

So, being respectful to a kid and his family that was tragically killed, instead of speculating about his death and seeming happy that your scouting report about him was correct, is "woke" according to you?

You have major issues and you'd NEVER say this stuff to the family.

I think his comments were blown out of proportion. I don't think he showed any happiness. It was just poor taste and timing.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Why are you so salty?

He's a very sad person.

 

[G2]

Why are you so salty?

People will seem salty when you make claims with no evidence in this murder case.

Do you see the irony?

 

[Pass2Run]

Who was charged?