Anyone will always receive flack for pointing this out.Rooting has zero tangible effects on what a team does unless it is due to noise created inside a stadium.
Rooting has zero effects on which players are picked by any team. By golly, it has zero effect on making idiot Jerry Jones smarter or wiser on the picks he signs off on. I would be stroking out rooting for losses if that were the case, lol.
99.9% of rooting serves one purpose: self-gratifying fulfillment. It makes a person feel good to cheer for favorite teams, players, etc.
Rooting guarantees nothing else. And it 100% does not secure bona fide players, who will 100% help their teams win as professionals.
Even the 'it increases the odds of gaining the best players' argument is completely contingent on which players are drafted by each team. Additionally, fans' personal hopes-and-dreams hinges solely upon how well each player translate their college talent to the professional level.
This will always be an illogical back-and-forth. Rooting for wins does not guarantee the best players that will work best in an offense or defense, regardless if it is pick number one overall or Mr. Irrelevant. Ditto for rooting for losses.
In the end, all drafting, good and bad, is contingent upon sound, thorough, intelligent evaluation of an entire front office staff. That includes the one person deciding if any projected, pre-draft chart selection is the optimal guy to pick.