First of all it was two years 18,000,000 that's 9,000,000 per year.. Wasn't about being cheap I've explained this before most teams didn't go after him including the Titans didn't bring him back because they thought at some point this freak of nature was gonna fall off a Cliff at his age in the mileage most didn't expect this type of season so yeah Jerry failed to bring him here it wasn't about money it was more about worrying about bringing in a running back up in age and up in mileage and then have him not play well you know like last year Tony didn't play well for $11 million and this year we have $6 million on dead cap space from zeke's old contract so I think he's clearing out the books but I blame the offensive line more than the running backs I blame the offensive coordinator not scheming guys open I watch Christian McCaffrey go down it's some dude I never heard of it's running like one of the running backs in the league...
Seriously did you see that running back I never heard of I bet everyone's gonna say they heard of him but Christian McCaffrey goes out they don't miss a beat at the run game now maybe they're missing him being multifaceted but sometimes it's the offense and I'm blaming McCarthy not Jerry this time but yes it would've been nice to at least draft 1/3 or 4th rounder..
But I'm gonna say this one last time this has been about defense the games we lost last year the game we lost in the playoffs and and so far this year the defense has been the main cause so you're acting like we should just outscore people and all you do is mention the offense just because we paid most of our money on that side of the ball that's not how it works and you can't hold teams under 20 points you're a terrible defense I don't know what the average defense is for holding scores down throughout an entire year and in years past but that's typically what you wanna see but some of the best defenses to ever play has held teams under 13 points a game for an entire season think about that think about taking the pressure off your offense and allowing them more possessions like you look at the giants game we would absolutely curb stomp them at the defense got us the ball back they may have stopped the run but guess what they let him pass all over the field you're saying we need to stop the run they stopped the run but they couldn't stop the pass they played well in the goal red zone area but their time of possession eating drives the defense couldn't get the ball back to your offense enough we can't score enough..
That's what he got in Baltimore, but that doesn't mean he'd demand that much here, especially since he lives here. I think he probably agrees to $6 mil if we were to have offered him that.
Secondly, just cuz I want a better rushing attack doesn't mean I don't also want better run defence. Unless you're just trying to be argumentative just to be argumentative, no where did I say I only wanted the rushing attack to get better. Then again, this isn't the first time you've refused to read my entire post. I'm at least giving you the decency to read your lengthy post. I would really appreciate it if you would read my entire posts before posting as opposed to just picking from what I said just to argue a point I wasn't even making. I wanted a NT as high up in this last draft as we could. I made that very clear even going back to my mock drafts back in March and April that I wanted a big run stuffing NT. Don't get me wrong, I like Kneeland, but our issues this year, much like last year, are stopping the run and running the ball. They work HAND IN HAND. If you can't stop the run, like you said, then you can't get the ball back to your offense quickly. However, it also works the other way around too. If you can't run the ball, then 1. You're going to wear your defence down, 2. You're putting too much on your QB. Even Mahomes needs a running game. Also, 3. You can't close our games late.
Plus, sometimes, there are games where you can't throw the ball very well, such as poor weather. In that case, you need someone like Henry (also, signing Henry and getting a NT isn't mutually exclusive, if we had a competent GM) to get you most of your points. Also, guys like Micah Parsons would greatly appreciate a good running game, as well as a better run defence.
If you asked Micah Parsons, he'd probably tell you he'd have loved to have Henry on this team. Not only does he need better run stopping (also, you may recall that I got flamed on here for making it clear that I thought NT is one of the top 5 most important positions on a team), but he needs us to be able to run the ball so that he's fresher throughout the game.
Finally, yes, we lost in large part because of our run defence to Green Bay, but we also didn't have a great rushing attack. That was consistent in all our losses last year. I was pounding the table on here last year for us to trade for Derrick Henry. In no world was Pollard going to be a sufficient rushing attack. He was good. But that's not what he's best at. I wanted BOTH a better rushing attack AND nose tackle. I'm not saying much different than you are. I'm not diminishing NT at all. I still think it's at least top 5-8 in terms of importance on a football team. However, almost as important is also a top running back. Is Troy the same QB he was without Emmitt Smith? Is Roger Staubach what he was without Duane Thomas or Dorsett? What Troy had working well for him was that he had both Russell Maryland AND Emmitt Smith. I wanted both a top NT (either FA or draft) AND Derrick Henry. I'm angry with Jerry because he addressed NEITHER.