Cowboys22;2873446 said:
Thats not how it works especially at this stage. The league didn't give the Cowboys anymore rookie cap space the year they signed Hutchinson.
That's because Hutch wasn't a draft pick. He was a free agent signee and as a FA signee, the league doesn't count them when they issue the slot amount. It's up to the team to fit him in.
I also recall the year that Eli was drafted and then traded to the Giants, it became an issue because the Giants had to sign the #1 overall pick but were only alloted the rookie cap space for whatever spot they took Phillip Rivers in.
You're mixing up facts. Yes, there was an issue with the Giants and Eli's negotiations after the trade, but it had nothing to do with the league, or directly related to the rookie slots. It was about Eli's
agent demanding the Giants pay Eli as THE #1 pick of the draft even though he got traded. The Giants wanted to pay him from their slot, but the agent would have none of it.
This is one of the main reasons you very rarely see rookies drafted and then traded. The teams always prefer to trade the picks so they get the rookie cap space needed to sign them.
Actually, it has nothing to do with it. The main reason is that if a team has to trade a draft pick after it makes it ( and we're talking about high picks, not lower picks who are usually special team players most of the time, if not developmental squad material ), it usually means that the player wasn't going to be signed, which usually means is the later part of AT LEAST training camp, meaning that rookie player will have little, if any, impact at all.
The easiest theoratical barometer for this scenario is this:
Have the 49ers renounce the rights to Crabs and see how many teams would line up to claim him. Rookie slot or not ( and it is the same wether you trade him or sign him as a FA ), there would be 31 teams in the league putting in a claim.