Dalton throws for 300+ yds: fans say keep him. Dak threw for 450+ yds 3 times, fans say cut him?

ChronicCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,402
Reaction score
15,739
Dalton will command way more if you intend on making him the starter. But he’ll still only cost half of what Dak will.

It’s a question worth posing, especially if the team feels it needs to invest more on defense. Dalton has shown he can produce and win with this offense.

One thing is for certain...Dak doesn’t want to see Andy take this team to the playoffs. A playoff run would make Jerry’s decision for him.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,122
Reaction score
22,616
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
while I agree with you 100 percent it’s more about the cost per yard not the total yards.

those that dislike dak and don’t want to sign him don’t feel the value is there at 35 mil....but for a dalton at 2 mil they are stoked
The Cowboys wouldn't be able to re-sign Dalton at $2 million though. Obviously he would still be cheaper than Dak, but the gap would be much less than when he was signed to be a 1 year backup.
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
The difference: Romo was a CHOKER (as time proved to be true...I warned y'all). Dak is not.

Romo went Hollywood after his first year as a starter in 2006. Dak did not.

That's the difference you guys up till today refuse to understand.

One QB LIVES FOOTBALL 24/7. The other one didn't. Clear as day.


Dak isn't a choker???? How did he do against Philly last season with the division title on the line?
 

foofighters

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,421
Reaction score
7,101
That's funny. Nice spin. To be a starting QB in the NFL, one has to be smart enough to understand the playbook and read defenses. Yet, you refuse to acknowledge the most obvious: One went Hollywood. The other one hasn't. One lives and breathes football 24/7 and improves himself for the game of football. The other one, not so much.

You're lovefest even 5 years later is nauseating.

The Hollywood comment is funny. I don't really remember seeing him in LOTR or the Matrix. Maybe that was the Too Fast movies. I see Dak on a lot of commercials. For years and years and years and years, NFL players are on TV for commercials or TV spots or movie appearances. It's really no different than having to give out interviews. You're reaching AC. You always have. oh, and guess what? I DON'T HATE DAK!!! I like the guy and don't mind him at all as our QB. You mistake a lovefest for realism. I was hard on Romo but I was fair. Just like I am with Dak. You cannot be fair.
 

CowboysRule

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,464
Reaction score
4,989
The difference: Romo was a CHOKER (as time proved to be true...I warned y'all). Dak is not.

Romo went Hollywood after his first year as a starter in 2006. Dak did not.

That's the difference you guys up till today refuse to understand.

One QB LIVES FOOTBALL 24/7. The other one didn't. Clear as day.
Romo had more come from behind victories than any other QB we've had here. Romo improved as a QB every year from the time he was drafted. You seriously can't believe what you wrote, can you?
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,681
Reaction score
50,146
I get defending Dak, but you're trying to silence the haters by being a hater. Romo pretty clearly lives and breathes football. You dont go from UDFA to starting QB without being a student of the game. The only knock on romo was he had a hobby that was in the public eye.
I'm a hater? I'm simply stating facts. I always said Romo studied and knew the game well, but the truth is he went Hollywood. Dak hasn't. That's the difference. Bill Parcells had a warning about QBs who seek the off-the-field limelight.
 

aikemirv

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,394
Reaction score
9,991
Have you watched a Cowboys game in the last two years?
Yep, he does not consistently get out of the pocket and make plays. He does it here and there. He is actually slow to leave the pocket and heavy footed getting out of it!
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,681
Reaction score
50,146
Romo had more come from behind victories than any other QB we've had here. Romo improved as a QB every year from the time he was drafted. You seriously can't believe what you wrote, can you?
You're talking about a 14 year career for Romo. Dak has only been on the team for 4.5 years, yet Dak is on pace to shatter Romo's come from behind victories. Wisen up.
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,820
Reaction score
12,854
lol Dalton winning games that Dak loses? I remember Dalton and the other qbs struggling to put a touchdown on the board right after Dak went out. The defense has progressed significantly as the season went on as well. If the defense played like they did at the beginning of the year, there would have been zero wins after Dak went out.
 

LACowboysFan1

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,640
Reaction score
7,578
Who cares? I guarantee you don't say this when Dak does the same so spare us this logic. You can lie and say you do but without proof again spare me.

My comment has nothing to do with Dak, or what I say when Dak does the same, I was just noting that one game doesn't make an absolute determination.

The fixation on Dak never ceases to amaze....
 

Jipper

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,795
Reaction score
23,016
The Cowboys wouldn't be able to re-sign Dalton at $2 million though. Obviously he would still be cheaper than Dak, but the gap would be much less than when he was signed to be a 1 year backup.

yes that is true, but he's still not going to be getting anywhere near starter money at this point.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,681
Reaction score
50,146
....and here come the Dak defenders running to his defense when Dalton did what Dak couldn't do: beat Philly in a division title impact game.
The Defense finally waking up and creating turnovers the past 3 games is the difference. Wisen up.
 

thunderpimp91

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,925
Reaction score
19,096
I'm a hater? I'm simply stating facts. I always said Romo studied and knew the game well, but the truth is he went Hollywood. Dak hasn't. That's the difference. Bill Parcells had a warning about QBs who seek the off-the-field limelight.
OK, ill give you benefit of a doubt and bite....what made Romo Hollywood?
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,681
Reaction score
50,146
lol Dalton winning games that Dak loses? I remember Dalton and the other qbs struggling to put a touchdown on the board right after Dak went out. The defense has progressed significantly as the season went on as well. If the defense played like they did at the beginning of the year, there would have been zero wins after Dak went out.
BAM!!! TRUTH!

:hammer::hammer::hammer:
 

bsbellomy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,416
Reaction score
3,183
Fans aren't involved with salary and contract details, I wish they all knew this.

No but you are on a message board for people to give their opinions, maybe you should refresh your knowledge about what is supposed to go on here.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
Yep, he does not consistently get out of the pocket and make plays. He does it here and there. He is actually slow to leave the pocket and heavy footed getting out of it!
If you think this, then you don't actually watch any other teams in the NFL to have the right context. This is just an absolutely terrible take on him. He's not Lamar Jackson

There are maybe 4 (Rodgers, Russ, Patt, Watson) quarterbacks in the league who have the same ability to throw in the pocket and out of the pocket as Dak.
 
Top