Dat too small for 3-4?

[Seven]

Amazing how much insight some have, of Dat, viewing the game via television.
No way you're seeing the big picture. You aren't field level and you aren't calling the plays/schemes. How in the hell do YOU know what Dat is and is not supposed to be doing on every down? Some act as if he screws up at every snap of the ball and is personally responsible for a 2-2 record. I don't under stand it.
Here, let me help some of you.....1-800-step away from the ledge.
Or for those hell bent on the "Dat sucks" wagon..........1-800-JUMP.

 

[junk]

All you advocates of going back to your passive 4-3 cover 2 are killing me! :laugh2: Go watch the Skins last 5 minutes - thats what we were in. Thats Vanilla as it gets and Brunnell smoked us.

I watched the Skins last five minutes.....Dallas wasn't in a 4-3 cover 2.

Here I have some links for you:
http://www.playfootball.com/footballfacts/lesson1.html

That one makes noises and has lots of colors, I think you will like it.

http://football.about.com/cs/a/defformations.htm

Here is a good one with all the different formations.

http://espn.go.com/ncf/columns/davie/1437187.html
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/ramblings.php?p=167&cat=1

Cover 2


http://www.coachillustrated.com/CoachesManual/Football/CM_Pasqualoni43PG1.cfm

Here is one on Cover 4 and the 4-3 (note the author : )

Why don't you read up on some of this stuff and when you can at least make a somewhat close attempt at determining the correct coverage and formation from a game then we can talk some football. Thats what you like, right?

BTW, you are a big 3-4 advocate, so I included this link. You seem to be easily confused so I thought I would throw that in there so you can make sure the 3-4 is what you really support.

http://football.about.com/cs/a/34defense.htm

 

[Nors]

It was a base 4 man front with no pressure. Secondary deep - thats a passive D no matter what you call it. Brunell had all day to exploit us and he did.

Have a great day Junk!


More of that passive sit back and react defense agains Eagles and we get smoked.

 

[Chocolate Lab]

Let me see if I can get this right....

~clearing throat ~


Dat 3-4 productive college LB -- top comp. Shanle fringe player

Wins Bednarik over Kearse/Katz

Shanle -- 7th round substance abuse issues

Parcells collects LBs -- wouldn't deal Dat

Shanle castoff terrible Rams/martz def

Parcells -- "Dat can play any my old teams"/Shanle nickel only

Thee years in row... Dat beats out Shanle

Forget it Shanle lovers. It's over. Move on.

 

[LaTunaNostra]

Let me see if I can get this right....

~clearing throat ~


Dat 3-4 productive college LB -- top comp. Shanle fringe player

Wins Bednarik over Kearse/Katz

Shanle -- 7th round substance abuse issues

Parcells collects LBs -- wouldn't deal Dat

Shanle castoff terrible Rams/martz def

Parcells -- "Dat can play any my old teams"/Shanle nickel only

Thee years in row... Dat beats out Shanle

Forget it Shanle lovers. It's over. Move on.

Checkmate.

 

[junk]

It was a base 4 man front with no pressure. Secondary deep - thats a passive D no matter what you call it. Brunell had all day to exploit us and he did.

Have a great day Junk!


More of that passive sit back and react defense agains Eagles and we get smoked.

Well, I tried....

When you learn a little more, look me up and we'll talk football.

 

[TheHustler]

Sheesh. He's the teams leading tackler. He's got one sack and one int after the first four games. He's by far the most consistent defensive player we've had in the last 4-5 years, and some of you guys can't wait to run him off the field.

I'm amazed he's so underappreciated by his own fans, while no names like Shanle and Fowler who is a BASKETBALL player are being thrown in to replace him?

Makes me sick.

 

[Hostile]

Sheesh. He's the teams leading tackler. He's got one sack and one int after the first four games. He's by far the most consistent defensive player we've had in the last 4-5 years, and some of you guys can't wait to run him off the field.

I'm amazed he's so underappreciated by his own fans, while no names like Shanle and Fowler who is a BASKETBALL player are being thrown in to replace him?

Makes me sick.

Makes me sick too, but the basketball player was Reggie Love, not Fowler or Shanle. On that note, if the basketball player was as skilled as Antonio Gates I'd take it.

 

[Hostile]

Well, I tried....

When you learn a little more, look me up and we'll talk football.

He doesn't exactly care for facts Junk.

 

[Maikeru-sama]

Let me see if I can get this right....

~clearing throat ~


Dat 3-4 productive college LB -- top comp. Shanle fringe player

Wins Bednarik over Kearse/Katz

Shanle -- 7th round substance abuse issues

Parcells collects LBs -- wouldn't deal Dat

Shanle castoff terrible Rams/martz def

Parcells -- "Dat can play any my old teams"/Shanle nickel only

Thee years in row... Dat beats out Shanle

Forget it Shanle lovers. It's over. Move on.

POWNED!!!!

 

[Nors]

There is no Dat vesus Shanle. Silly

Shanle is versatile enough to play OLB (Last year starting and playing impressive. Now he moves inside. Is our best coverage guy per BP and has a nosey for the QB in limited action - 1 1/2 sacks!

Shanle's future is ahead of him!

 

[Zman5]

There is no Dat vesus Shanle. Silly

Shanle is versatile enough to play OLB (Last year starting and playing impressive. Now he moves inside. Is our best coverage guy per BP and has a nosey for the QB in limited action - 1 1/2 sacks!

Shanle's future is ahead of him!

At a Burger King.

 

[baj1dallas]

Is our best coverage guy per BP

When did BP say that? Anyway I don't buy it. Dat is better. Period.

 

[blindzebra]

When did BP say that? Anyway I don't buy it. Dat is better. Period.

He didn't, Parcells said he was better in coverage than James.

The original plans were Dat and Burnett in nickel, but Burnett kept missing time.

 

[TheHustler]

Makes me sick too, but the basketball player was Reggie Love, not Fowler or Shanle. On that note, if the basketball player was as skilled as Antonio Gates I'd take it.

My mistake, you're right.

 

[Rack]

It was a base 4 man front with no pressure.

The fact that Nors sees a 4 man front and thinks it's a 4-3 already shows everything you need to know... that he knows nothing.

We were in our nickel D, not a 4-3.

And about the lack of pressure, I agree... but I suppose a 3 man front would of given us MORE pressure?

 

[Rack]

When did BP say that? Anyway I don't buy it. Dat is better. Period.

He never said that. EVER. He said Shanle was a better Nickel Backer then Brady James, but he never said he was the best coverage backer.

 

[Chief]

Dat is a warrior. He's the best LB on the team, the player who is actually doing his job in the 3-4, and one of the best players on the D.

Period. The disrespect shown towards him is nauseating.

Bingo.

I couldn't have said it better.

 

[Joe71]

Let me see if I can get this right....

~clearing throat ~


Dat 3-4 productive college LB -- top comp. Shanle fringe player

Wins Bednarik over Kearse/Katz

Shanle -- 7th round substance abuse issues

Parcells collects LBs -- wouldn't deal Dat

Shanle castoff terrible Rams/martz def

Parcells -- "Dat can play any my old teams"/Shanle nickel only

Thee years in row... Dat beats out Shanle

Forget it Shanle lovers. It's over. Move on.

:bravo: wned: :disseags:

 

[Nors]

He never said that. EVER. He said Shanle was a better Nickel Backer then Brady James, but he never said he was the best coverage backer.

He absolutely said it at a PC. I listen to most all of them.

Who's a better coverage backer? Thought so.
Dat - haha
Als - haha
James - Hardy Har Har
Ware - nope

Its Shanle and thats why he's on Nickel....