CowboyMcCoy;3266819 said:
It wasn't meant to be taken literally.
It doesn't even work rhetorically. It just sounds breathless.
It's not an accusation; it's a theory of what else may have happened.
Why is conjecture about Deon's guilt based on facts worse than your conjecture based on anything but?
Really, you believe it every time someone makes an allegation?
Depends on the allegation and the supporting facts. There is certainly nothing to make this allegation completely unreasonable, and the complaint is certainly more believable than your fantastic theories to the contrary.
And what facts do you know other than there was a complaint made and a warrant filed for deadly conduct.
There's enough to file a charge, which means that evidence and testimony is sufficiently present to cause law enforcement to act.
I want people to be treated fairly through due process, not be convicted by the media and handgun alarmists.
Who is denying him due process for crying out loud? Who is arguing to deny it? NOBODY. Just because I conclude he is likely in deep trouble and probably did what is alleged doesn't have any material affect on how he goes through the criminal justice system. Because *I* think he likely did it, based on what is known, doesn't mean anything other than... I think he likely did it.
What is a handgun alarmist? I surely am not one of those... I have a CHL and carry arm 18 inches from my keyboard. That said, it is precisely the kind of behavior alleged here that gives handguns a bad rap. It's not the gun, it's the clown flashing it.
I'm saying wait for the facts. That's my rationalization and my analysis. But I'm just going by legal principles such as innocent until proven guilty.
You could have stated "We need to wait for all the facts before jumping to any great conclusions" - instead, we heard oddball theories that were far more fantastic conjecture based on desires as a fan of a team than real dispassionate, rational thought.
We have likely beaten this to death, to me the facts don't look very good for Deon, I see frankly little reason to expect any explanation to pan out other than what has been reported - that he was upset with a valet and brandished a gun, which is far more believable than a valet took his gun, tossed it in the bushes, then... you get the picture.