Mac_MaloneV1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,437
- Reaction score
- 5,739
Because he's not worth it.They're really missing LVE.
No idea why we didn't get in on Roquan Smith.
Because he's not worth it.They're really missing LVE.
No idea why we didn't get in on Roquan Smith.
Then kiss the 49ers game goodbye again.Because he's not worth it.
The 9ers haven't run the ball well against Dallas. In the playoffs their offense hasn't done anything and earlier this year the big plays were all in the passing game.Then kiss the 49ers game goodbye again.
ouch lolAnd our offense extends its streak of games without a 100 yard rusher.
170 yds rushing. 6.3 YPC. Yeah, they really couldn't run the ball against us.The 9ers haven't run the ball well against Dallas. In the playoffs their offense hasn't done anything and earlier this year the big plays were all in the passing game.
That streak will end soon and the defense will be exposed.as much as I can appreciate stats and rankings,
I watched the games,
if a team wanted to run for 100 yards and get an individual player big yards, it would be easy against this defense the problem is a lot of these games our blowouts and they have to abandon the run...
so let's stay off that streak, its an illusion, they are not good at stopping the run and if teams were smart they would keep calling for their running backs and their mobile qbacks too be played against this defense just like Arizona did I think Carolina made a mistake putting their rookie quarterback standing up back there that often and the drive that they look the best in the two scoring drives they ran a lot and they kept running and we kept not stopping the run. If they wanted a 100 yard rusher and that was the goal that would be easy to do against this defense...
Hey, I'm not trying to be negative I'm just trying to be honest here.... We are not a good run stopping defense it just looks like that because we didn't give up 100 yard rusher but my eyes tell me we have the same problems in the center of our defense whether that's the line or the linebackers or the safeties that play linebacker who are too small to stop the run that's always been a problem with Dan Quinn's defenses...
I think if you take into account the teams going more with running back by committee and sometimes a lot of teams going wide receiver by committee trying to spread the ball around in this day and age it's much different if they wanted to I believe that they could easily get 100 yards on our team in both categories... I mean if you choose to feed a guy like we did with CD land the last month you can get those stats if they chose to use one running back all game even at under 4 yards per carry it would only take 25 carries I believe that's how it used to be and backs used to be able to do that and I believe if they wanted to give one back 25 plus carries here they would get their 100 yards that's no longer the philosophy..... Yes it's still a nice story for fans but I'm really not impressed with rankings and or these type of statistical anomalies or streaks...That's an impressive state no matter how you slice it. I don't care who we've played or what other teams are doing. The stat still exists.
OK Mr. negative we get your little schtick and it was unnecessary here. The response is here so two directions either overly positive or overly negative where is the middle ground I'm the middle ground by the way the defense has already been exposed so has the offense so has the special team so has the coaches but that's the point week to week they must make adjustments and make changes... Just like it was pointed out during the game that it looks like they had our snap count and our silent count was a little too easily diagnosed and I think they fixed that in the second-half and that offensive line looked a lot better you do devise game plans that are different for every game and that's why you have to know your weaknesses and you make adjustments for each team thats up next..That streak will end soon and the defense will be exposed.
These numbers are completely fake.So, we played another team who employs two RBs and gives them both carries. What's the significance again?
170 yds rushing. 6.3 YPC. Yeah, they really couldn't run the ball against us.
Why do you make stuff up?
Tampa, Chicago, NYG, NE, Min, ATLCan some point me to where to find who has the best rush defense? I cannot find it.
Wow so maybe we are a good team?Tampa, Chicago, NYG, NE, Min, ATL
Notice that all of the actual good defenses are on the right
https://rbsdm.com/stats/stats/
Coach, it looked like DQ was daring them to run most of the game by playing 6 in the box.Not enough size in the MLB position...our DL is allowing the OL to get to the second level and our little LBs are getting pushed around.
our DTs should be taking up the center and both guards. That's not happening.
Yep, very light.Coach, it looked like DQ was daring them to run most of the game by playing 6 in the box.
This should be obvious lolCoach, it looked like DQ was daring them to run most of the game by playing 6 in the box.
We sacrifice some run-stopping to have the lighter, faster players for coverage and pass rush. So far it has been effective as we're relying on teams not being able to just run the ball all day and having to pass. Even when Carolina was moving the ball by running it, eventually they get into a situation where they have to pass and our defense can shine and shut them down.as much as I can appreciate stats and rankings,
I watched the games,
if a team wanted to run for 100 yards and get an individual player big yards, it would be easy against this defense the problem is a lot of these games our blowouts and they have to abandon the run...
so let's stay off that streak, its an illusion, they are not good at stopping the run and if teams were smart they would keep calling for their running backs and their mobile qbacks too be played against this defense just like Arizona did I think Carolina made a mistake putting their rookie quarterback standing up back there that often and the drive that they look the best in the two scoring drives they ran a lot and they kept running and we kept not stopping the run. If they wanted a 100 yard rusher and that was the goal that would be easy to do against this defense...
Hey, I'm not trying to be negative I'm just trying to be honest here.... We are not a good run stopping defense it just looks like that because we didn't give up 100 yard rusher but my eyes tell me we have the same problems in the center of our defense whether that's the line or the linebackers or the safeties that play linebacker who are too small to stop the run that's always been a problem with Dan Quinn's defenses...
Huh?If Chubba Hubbard got 30 carries and the Panthers didn't commit those stupid penalties they probably win.
RBs still matter. This is NOT a passing league no matter how much you want to think it is.