Defensive Line

[CCBoy]

you really do need an editor. But back to the subject of fight in the dog, you only really know that in real games. And those mentioned have not been in real games for a while. So how much fight is left in dem dere dogs is open to question.

I can believe in Disney Land as well, and bring up a Magician as the monitor...and hit target as well as that just did. But you need a good dose of the Army, to question demonstrated fight in the soldier.

It doesn't take being a 'fly boy' to understand right aerilons on a left bank when flying a jet. Yea, I've flown a jet while at the Academy.

But specific dynamics around dihedrial isn't needed when a door gunner and firing a 40 mike mike out the side door of a Chopper in bank.
You still walk tracers appearing in ellipse, onto target. Of course, the ellipse being needed to evade incoming fire....of course, right?

One can seek medical attention or an editor to convert the above into one's own diatribe if desired.

Information was presented in both occasions...even if one is sitting strictly on convenience of attitude shown.

You ignored the foundation point, as always....this group of Cowboys fight at an intense level. That being the most important ingredient in changing from a terrible to good defensive unit....uh, the topic being discussed.

Don't even proclaim sophistication in language although, your disagreements are based upon arrogance, not defining difference as in topical discussion.

That didn't rise to the level of a 'squat do jazz.' Now, google that through an Air Force Academy route...but actually watching the off season with developmental aspects in view, instead of a limp item in hand...Hero.

 

[LandryFan]

you really do need an editor interpreter. But back to the subject of fight in the dog, you only really know that in real games. And those mentioned have not been in real games for a while. So how much fight is left in dem dere dogs is open to question.

FIFY

 

[CCBoy]

For some reason i thought the decision on Brent was supposed to come down quickly.

The Commissioner is already under fire for the lower punishment given out for knocking out a woman, than a drug that just hasn't met being defined by an agreement between the NFL and the Union. The Union first attempts to protect process. The NFL attempts to protect authority and financial matters.

But the Cowboys just have to await the handling of social appearance by the Commissioner at present...as does Brent.

 

[CCBoy]

FIFY

Or simply a broader base for comparison...at the least, more curiosity as to more than an emotional rehash.

I don't support your stated level of tar and bucket brigade when credibility of the team or it's players is made fun of...take your dictionary, thesaurus, or burn barrel code of conduct or College level 101 all you wish. I won't journey past giving respect to the team and it's players. For any convenience of excuses. A decade ago...or today.

Back to your Ripple, chief.

 

[Seven]

Not sure why everyone thinks Brent is gonna walk back into football..... we need to expect a lengthly NFL suspension think 4-6 game. Then is this guy even in football shape.....he hasn't played NFL football for a LOOOONG time....been smoking weed and setting in jail for the last year and folks around here act like his is a savior for the DL.....freaking amazing...does he even know the system....is he in shape......he was average to begin with and what is gonna make him better now..... All this Brent talk is so far in left field its amazing.....

It's all we got, bro.

That and a bag of chips.

Leave it be..............

 

[LandryFan]

Or simply a broader base for comparison...at the least, more curiosity as to more than an emotional rehash.

I don't support your stated level of tar and bucket brigade when credibility of the team or it's players is made fun of...take your dictionary, thesaurus, or burn barrel code of conduct or College level 101 all you wish. I won't journey past giving respect to the team and it's players. For any convenience of excuses. A decade ago...or today.

Back to your Ripple, chief.

Or simply a broader base for comparison...at the least, more curiosity as to more than an emotional rehash.
I don't support your stated level of tar and bucket brigade when credibility of the team or it's players is made fun of...take your dictionary, thesaurus, or burn barrel code of conduct or College level 101 all you wish. I won't journey past giving respect to the team and it's players. For any convenience of excuses. A decade ago...or today.

Back to your Ripple, chief.

 

[CCBoy]

Since you are unable to afford enough box tops to get your own decoder ring...the Cliff note version, and already posted:

WPB, you and I will just watch and let the player prove a theory out...not marrying him with a theory first.

 

[birdwells1]

Could potentially be solid later in the season if everything works out perfectly

WDE Lawrence/Mincey
3DT Melton/Okoye
1DT Brent/McClain/Bishop
SDE Spencer/Selvie/Crawford

We just don't have that guy that's going to give you double figured sacks. Looking at the last few super bowl winners, most of them had that guy, the one who offenses had to game plan against. The only one that has that potential is Lawrence and we won't find that out until later in the year if at all.

 

[LandryFan]

Since you are unable to afford enough box tops to get your own decoder ring...the Cliff note version, and already posted:

WPB, you and I will just watch and let the player prove a theory out...not marrying him with a theory first.

....OK.....

 

[Hoofbite]

Try watching the fight in the dogs, first...

Is this advice or a directive?

 

[CCBoy]

Is this advice or a directive?

Neither, just pointing out the dog fight in progress...and loving that addition to this very camp. Oh, and no mention of a Michael Vick needed also...if ambiguous is presented, that is what is meant. Unless, of course, you are asking me directly if I have bats in the belfry?

 

[CCBoy]

Hoof, this is what one misses if he is not watching what's going on:

Rookie linebacker Anthony Hitchens has had a really nice camp. Completely under the radar. Which is confusing since at times there seemed to be more media covering a football practice than at the White House briefing room. Still, didn’t hear much about Hitchens. The fourth-round pick has been solid, can play multiple positions, too, as can Justin Durant, who was hands down the defensive MVP of camp. It wasn’t even close, either

One of my most endearing images of this camp was the legendary Monte Kiffin walking off the field with his arm draped around Rolando McClain. This was a random morning, and McClain wasn’t even in pads, but the dialogue between the two fascinated me. Each was as engaged as the other in the back-and-forth. And as confirmed later, McClain knew verbatim of Kiffin’s background. That’s cool stuff.

Still not sure what the deal is with McClain. If he’s committed, this guy should be one of the top players on this defense. Physically speaking, he’s the most intimidating presence on the team. Last guy you want to meet in a dark alley? No debate. McClain.

http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/a...ld-Head-/97ebe707-ec4d-4367-9fa7-4320314d3ad2

And no further explanation of the bark in the dog...offered.

 

[tayloner]

I would be elated to get a significant contribution out of just one of those guys (Okoye, Spencer, Brent), much less all three.

 

[Hoofbite]

Neither, just pointing out the dog fight in progress...and loving that addition to this very camp. Oh, and no mention of a Michael Vick needed also...if ambiguous is presented, that is what is meant. Unless, of course, you are asking me directly if I have bats in the belfry?

No need to ask. I've already concluded that much.

 

[CCBoy]

No need to ask. I've already concluded that much.

That was never in question, you always phrase to leave an implied insult in place, and of course, also an ownership of all available high ground as well.

Didn't begin to think you were seeking a discussion about actual points in play upon the gridiron. Just your view of it all...again, Implied in nature.

Now presume the above, as something less than knowledgeable comprehension within the English language.

I don't have to hide behind the paraphrased and subtle meanings.

But if you are instead saying that you also have a humor...good, nothing in harm. Your quarter. Call what you please.

 

[gimmesix]

Could the addition of Brent, Okoye coupled with Spencers return solidify our dline by midseason? The return of scandrick, increased experience for youngins and leadership of Wilcox could make this defense formidable by the 6th game. R McClain may solidify our lbs.

I feel like this defense will give me feel good moments..just maybe not early :/

There are a lot of ifs involved with their additions, and it makes me wonder how Dallas will handle it. Expecting any of those linemen to be ready to go at the beginning of the year is likely too much, but if all three return before the season, Dallas will have to plan for that on its 53.

Not that big of a deal because there are probably several linemen who are only making the roster because we don't have anything better, but if we keep 10 (and those three are included), it would have to look something like this:

Jeremy Mincey and DeMarcus Lawrence
Henry Melton
Nick Hayden and/or Terrell McClain
George Selvie and Tyrone Crawford

So that's either six or seven, which possibly leaves one spot for:
Davon Coleman
Ken Bishop
Kenneth Boatright
Dartwan Bush
Caesar Rayford
Martez Wilson
Zach Minter

Of course, I like a healthy Okoye and Spencer better than any of the guys we would lose or relegate to the practice squad ... and I'm hopeful if these are the options that either Coleman or Bishop will prove good enough to push Hayden off the roster.

 

[Hoofbite]

That was never in question, you always phrase to leave an implied insult in place, and of course, also an ownership of all available high ground as well.

Didn't begin to think you were seeking a discussion about actual points in play upon the gridiron. Just your view of it all...again, Implied in nature.

Now presume the above, as something less than knowledgeable comprehension within the English language.

I don't have to hide behind the paraphrased and subtle meanings.

But if you are instead saying that you also have a humor...good, nothing in harm. Your quarter. Call what you please.

You were insulted by my asking if that was a suggestion or direction?

And please, inform me of what the "high ground" in this topic would be.

You don't "hide" behind subtle meaning but deal with it nearly exclusively. Somehow you've drawn a discussion on Michael Vick out of all of this.

 

[CCBoy]

You were insulted by my asking if that was a suggestion or direction?

And please, inform me of what the "high ground" in this topic would be.

You don't "hide" behind subtle meaning but deal with it nearly exclusively. Somehow you've drawn a discussion on Michael Vick out of all of this.

Looking for excuses, and since hoofbite has started in on an insultive vein with YOU...take your puzzle parts and assemble it as you wish. But your intent is still called frankly, as nothing but pompous jibberish for your own amusement that justifies yourself.

I can play your intentional tit for tat game all day long...as to insulted, take YOUR puzzle part home, and don't forget your football as well!!

 

[Hoofbite]

Looking for excuses, and since hoofbite has started in on an insultive vein with YOU...take your puzzle parts and assemble it as you wish. But your intent is still called frankly, as nothing but pompous jibberish for your own amusement that justifies yourself.

I can play your intentional tit for tat game all day long...as to insulted, take YOUR puzzle part home, and don't forget your football as well!!

So you can't answer either question?

 

[CCBoy]

So you can't answer either question?

No, I'm not a coon ***...or ridge runner...you?

Oh, and at 6, you need to pick up your medicine...or learn to discuss football again.