Better than being funny looking I guess.
Over anyone??? Where did I say that? Cowboys have kept injured players in the past and are keeping injured players on 53 this season as well. Jenkins outplayed Russell (PS this season, IR last season), Tapper (injured but on 53), Mayowa (53) and Collins (53). Only arguing if going to keep an injured guy, then keep the injured guy who proved he can make plays in games. Not against retaining Tapper, Collins or even Russell as projects but make room for the performers regardless if draft pick or UDFA. Maybe bump off an extra FB or crappy safety instead.
Since Jenkins is apparently injured enough that he would have went on IR, you might as well have said just take anyone. As it is, giving him an injury settlement might be the best way to get him back when he is healthy. No one else is going to grab him while he is injured.
Okoye can only play the guys he is lined up against, don't hold that against him. Russell also played against the same scrubs in 4th preseason game, Okoye played head and shoulders above him. Getting position is not enough, enough excuses for the underperformers, Cowboys need players who can finish. Okoye is better finisher than Russell, Coe, Collins and Mayowa but not married to the guy so could care less if they bring in better players. Just don't settle for guys who can't produce on field because they were draft picks.
You can hold it against Okoye, if he had played better and displayed more in practice, he would have got a chance to play with the ones. And just for the record, wasn't Okoye mainly playing DT, not DE? So he would be competing against Crawford, McClain, Thornton and Collins. He's not better than any of them with the possible exception of Collins.
How can you argue that he is better than Mayowa for example when Mayowa played like 2-3 series against Seattle's starters? And again, you are comparing guys at different positions. Okoye isn't going to be a DE, he is a DT.
BUT isn't this your argument against retaining Jenkins? I hope Collins is not 100% because he is not living up to his hype otherwise. Both Irving and Jenkins were given game reps without the practice time and scheme study that Collins got, and both were immediate game changers.
Nope, not the same....Collins hurt himself 6 weeks ago and just came back to the active team about 10 days ago. Jenkins got hurt two weeks ago and it appears that he won't be ready to play for some time. He can't help us right now.
You see one sack while I saw tackles for loss, chasing runs from backside, hustle, pressures and availability. Now that he's injured his best asset, availability, is moot. But still out produced and out hustled Russell. Mayowa love is equally perplexing, he's a Raider scrub who has yet to show us anything.
Arguing for McAdoo by comparing him to Russell makes no sense, since Russell was cut, and just because McAdoo played well in the scrub game really doesn't mean much. He did almost nothing the first three preseason games but because he flashed in one suddenly he is a must keep? It doesn't really work that way...it's your body of work.
As far as Mayowa, yes, it is true we haven't seen much out of him, again due to an injury at the start of camp, but he has just got healthy and looked active in the limited time he played. He did get a pressure or two in limited snaps. And he is a vet free agent that they signed, so he is going to get more of a look than and UDFA. It works that way for every team. Since there is a salary cap, we can't just take dead money hits without a reasonable evaluation time.
Of course they are limited or otherwise they would have been drafted. But even at this level, even stars, have limitations. But their pedigree should not trump on field performance. Neither Wilson, Gachkar nor Durant were as impactful on field as either Akunne or King. Again, not advocating keeping either guy but for Pete's sake don't reward mediocrity. Wilson, Gachkar, Durant, Rod Wilson, Keith Wilson, Wilcox, Frazier, etc were mediocre, at best.
Wilson, Gachkar and Durant didn't play in the scrub game, which is the only game that these guys did anything. And they have a history...the team knows what they can do. There really isn't much evidence to suggest that King or Akunne are better than any of the guys mentioned. And when you compare them to the guys ahead of them at their positions, they weren't any better. Maybe King is a better LB than Frazier is a S, but there isn't much competition at S but there are several LB's ahead of King.
Good to agree on something beyond our common fandom for the Cowboys.