BHendri5
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,311
- Reaction score
- 1,485
Actually Emmitt fumbled just as much, if not more than Murray
What the heck are you talking about?
Actually Emmitt fumbled just as much, if not more than Murray
Ignorant is what you is
I posted in another thread how Emmitt had something close to twice as many fumbles after four years
What the heck are you talking about?
you had better do some research, or better research
Demarco's 1st four years. 14 total fumbles playoffs included).
Emmitt Smith's 1st four years. 27 total fumbles.
Checkmate.
Martin did make a helluva block and cleaned his man up, Murray has to get through that huge hole and HOLD ON TO THE BALL. Martin did his job.
Murray's fumble, not recovering the fumbled kickoff return, and Dez's catch were the 3 biggest plays in the game. Hanna had the ball right there! We could've stepped on their throats at that point. We pissed that game away. No doubt we could've beaten Seattle again and we'd be going for #6 one week from today. Ughhh....
I hated both scenarios (Murray's because there was an Interstate's worth of real estate available to him if he reaches the second level). But, I have to lend credence to the fact that the end of the 1st half nightmare was a six point swing. We lost by 5. *sigh*
It's not hard to find the numbers.To be thorough, I would figure Emmitt having an entire season's worth of extra carries over those four years in to the analysis...
What the heck are you talking about?
Really? You're going to make your decision on Murray based on one play? I'm glad you're not the GM.I regularly peruse here, participate plenty too and surprised I'm not seeing the angst on DeMarco's 3rd quarter fumble that I hold as being huge and unacceptable. He proved to be a workhorse this year but that one play, when we needed him most, he didn't deliver, period! With a potential new contact looming, that fail was a back breaker and shouldn't be glazed over......
Really? You're going to make your decision on Murray based on one play? I'm glad you're not the GM.
I'm also trying to get my head around this idea that players can control when the fumbles are going to come. As in, they say to themselves, "Okay, this is a really big game, can't fumble in this one," and as a result, they don't. Which makes me wonder why they don't just do that all the time.
(Note that I'm not talking about those end-of-game garbage time runs where you just wrap up the ball with two hands and don't care if you gain yards or not. Sure, you can minimize fumbles that way, but you won't be productive.)
Try reading the thread
yes, a heck of a play by Peppers but think Emmitt, in that situation, would have delivered - something to be said about that. That turnover prevented the boys from putting the Packers and the game away
I regularly peruse here, participate plenty too and surprised I'm not seeing the angst on DeMarco's 3rd quarter fumble that I hold as being huge and unacceptable. He proved to be a workhorse this year but that one play, when we needed him most, he didn't deliver, period! With a potential new contact looming, that fail was a back breaker and shouldn't be glazed over......
Martin did make a helluva block and cleaned his man up, Murray has to get through that huge hole and HOLD ON TO THE BALL. Martin did his job.
yep, pretty much.There was too much angst over the reversal of Dez's catch to talk about anything else.