Did the Justin Rogers enthusiasm hit a wall?

[CTcowboy203]

I don’t understand the “vibes” statement….from who? Local media or beat writers from the team, commenting on a player looking good in camp? We see that all the time, doesn’t mean they are ready to contribute day 1 or this year or sometimes even ever.

Beyond that, we can’t complain that the team doesn’t do enough to address DT or position of need and then complain that they add to the position- even with veteran bridge players

 

[gtb1943]

I don’t understand the “vibes” statement….from who? Local media or beat writers from the team, commenting on a player looking good in camp? We see that all the time, doesn’t mean they are ready to contribute day 1 or this year or sometimes even ever.

Beyond that, we can’t complain that the team doesn’t do enough to address DT or position of need and then complain that they add to the position- even with veteran bridge players

if we do not get results they deserve to be raked over the coals. Success is what matters. Just saying you tried is a loser move.

 

[Chasing6]

if we do not get results they deserve to be raked over the coals. Success is what matters. Just saying you tried is a loser move.

Success is defined differently by Jerry Jones and he is winning. He is perfectly comfortable hanging out at the rim.

 

[CTcowboy203]

if we do not get results they deserve to be raked over the coals. Success is what matters. Just saying you tried is a loser move.

Yes. IF. Your right. However, Your comparison is flawed because the context of the conversation is about an unproven rookie. We have no clue, if Rodger’s will be good or won’t be, so the team got insurance at the position. Complaining about them addressing a position, particularly after years of people complaining about not addressing team needs is even more of a loser move.

the context of the conversation is about an unproven rookie. We have no clue, if Rodger’s will be good or won’t be, so the team brought in some veterans. Crying about that- without even knowing how things will play out or ignoring the possible that Rodger’s could still have a huge role, is also a LOSER move.

 

[Chasing6]

Yes. IF. Your right. However, Your comparison is flawed because the context of the conversation is about an unproven rookie. We have no clue, if Rodger’s will be good or won’t be, so the team got insurance at the position. Complaining about them addressing a position, particularly after years of people complaining about not addressing team needs is even more of a loser move.

the context of the conversation is about an unproven rookie. We have no clue, if Rodger’s will be good or won’t be, so the team brought in some veterans. Crying about that- without even knowing how things will play out or ignoring the possible that Rodger’s could still have a huge role, is also a LOSER move.

Who defines what is results? Only Jerry gets to decide.