TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 75,952
- Reaction score
- 70,273
Thank you lol. They're so quick to defend Romo they missed the point of the thread. Its laughable lol.Some of you are missing the OP’s point.
The mouth-breathing idiots who hate Dak have been talking about his “record vs winning teams” ad nauseum this offseason. They also say Romo was a beast and Dak isn’t anywhere near his level.
“Record vs winning teams” is their latest piece of
evidence that Dak’s mediocre and not worth a big payday.
So the OP basically just took a 2x4 and slammed it upside their stupid skulls. I love it.
What's petty is the reason for posting it. I also find it petty when people start threads to show what Romo did better than Dak. How about we judge Dak on his own merits, good and bad?
So its petty to post Romo's team record against winning teams?
This isn't a Dak vs Romo thread. Hell I didn't even mention Dak becauseI didn't even think I had to. The point of the thread was to get the Romosexuals to understand how Dak and Romo aren't different. They both suffered under this coaching staff. This playbook. Lack of turnovers from the defense(Romo at least had some teams that could do it). Lack of emphasis on special teams.
People can come to this conclusion on Romo but they can't on Dak because of their bias. That's what this thread was about. There was no "pettiness" involved. If I wanted to be petty I could do what a lot of fans on this site do when it comes to Dak. You know? Regurgitate the same mindless and outdated narratives on Dak? If I wanted to be petty I would've brought up Dak's lack of playoff success or his end of the game boneheaded plays. But that's not what this was about.