JohnsKey19
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,688
- Reaction score
- 18,693
I cant fault the play-calling at all, unlike the GB game. We passed the ball at will and for the most part pass protection was not a problem.
DaBoys4Life;3129130 said:
I don't see how we can throw the ball 55 times and people are okay with the game play. Who da **** lines up in shotgun on the 4 yard line. Garret has zero confidence in the run game. He's quick to abandon the run.
Actually, you just drop your coverage deep... The CBs can pretty much cheat, pressing the WRs, because they know they have to run deep.. And when they see run...Witten was getting his, because the Giants were playing cover-2 all day, allowing the middle to be exposed...Cochese;3129164 said:I am pretty sure that Ginge fell right into the Giants hands. Its getting to be well known against us, stop the run, and wait for the inevitable self destruction.
Doomsday101;3129109 said:I agree. Dallas pounding the ball at a run blitz is only going to result in 3 and out. If a team is willing to sacrifice plays in the secondary in order to stop the run then only a fool would bang their heads against that wall. Dallas was able to move the ball and put up points we also had 52% success rate on 3rd down conversions.
khiladi;3129198 said:The issue isn't about running a certain amount of time... The reality is Garrett doesn't know how to run effectively, thus the shot-gun draw comment. Part of running is to force the coverage closer to the line, and Garrett's play calling doesn't force anybody up...
Doomsday101;3129109 said:I agree. Dallas pounding the ball at a run blitz is only going to result in 3 and out. If a team is willing to sacrifice plays in the secondary in order to stop the run then only a fool would bang their heads against that wall. Dallas was able to move the ball and put up points we also had 52% success rate on 3rd down conversions.
If the Giants are defending run, then you run play-action, which was almost non-existent in the game. Coupled by the fact that we are in shot-gun formation all the time, we severely limit the effectiveness of forcing DBs to play up... We try and go for the big strike all the time, and the Giants were just sitting back deep all day. We got a lot of yardage for a reason, part of it the Giants giving it up on purpose...WV Cowboy;3129216 said:The pass was working, the run was not, .. if anything we should have passed more.
Offense had nothing to do with why we lost.
Giving up one big run on defense and the PR is why we lost.
With seven of those coming for a forced fumble by Ratliff in Giant's territory... Like I said, the Giants were content with allowing yardage...Cochese;3129220 said:17 points in the first 58 minutes of the game isnt going to win you a damn thing.
They moved the ball, I sincerely disagree with 'putting up points'.
Doomsday101;3129214 said:Dallas ran the ball from under center as well and we still were not able to break through the run blitz. You do not have a clue as to what you are talking about. Giants were drawn up at the line though out the game thus we had 397 yards passing and put up 24 points through the air. What did Dallas in had nothing to do with the play of the offense. The offense did not allow Hick to run for a TD on a punt, the offense did not let Jacobs run 75 yards for a TD. Biggest mistake by offense was Barber fumble which came off short swing pass to the outside which you claimed in another post Dallas does not do because evidently Garrett only knows 1 pass route the deep ball. You don't spend much time thinking do you?
Dallas just needs to 'execute'...NextGenBoys;3129227 said:I've stopped even debating football with that guy. He really has no idea what he's talking about, and blames Garrett for everything...It's comical.
khiladi;3129232 said:Dallas just needs to 'execute'...
khiladi;3129224 said:If the Giants are defending run, then you run play-action, which was almost non-existent in the game. Coupled by the fact that we are in shot-gun formation all the time, we severely limit the effectiveness of forcing DBs to play up... We try and go for the big strike all the time, and the Giants were just sitting back deep all day. We got a lot of yardage for a reason, part of it the Giants giving it up on purpose...
My 'emphasis' on Garrett puts the 'emphasis' on Garrett, because he is the major problem of this offense. I hate to see such talent go to waste...He's akin to Dave Schula, prior to Norv coming here and revamping the whole offense that made it dominant...NextGenBoys;3129240 said:Your hatred for Garrett takes the players out of the equation and puts the burden completely on the coordinator and discredits the performance on the field.
It's a joke.
CowboyFan74;3129274 said:But even greater than all that we have a short yardage back as our feature back with 0 home run threat, BRILLIANT!!!