superpunk
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,330
- Reaction score
- 75
riggo said:c'mon, super. you know what i'm saying. i couldnt be more clear.
What you're saying has nothing to do with reality. He's a reporter. It doesn't matter what team he reports for. His statement was perfectly accurate, and the team he reports for should have nothing to do with his choice of words, there. It's irrelevant.
gibbs has never been high on draft picks to build a team. we'll see if his method works in the salary cap era.
Gibbs hasn't won **** with a salary cap. So far, his way - doesn't work, not for any team.
as for continuity- the skins are starting almost the same group of players both on O and D that they had last year. same O line, same RB, same QB, same #1 WR- they just added a #2 and #3. (that was badly needed) same D line except for carter. same DB's except safety.The continuity is there, pretty decent, but there's no opportunity to provide any depth. I'd guess that considering the money, the Skins are gonna go 3 wide pretty often. So, that's two new starters on offense, and two on defense (does Rogers count? - who'd gonna play WILL? So at least 5, maybe 6 new starters, if you count Rogers). There's no huge upgrade anywhere except at the #3 WR position, but all decent pickups. All successful teams draft for depth. That's impossible for the Skins.
I've said it before, if anyone can start a new trend with free agency, it's Gibbs. But, thus far, it's never been done. Until it is, myself, and every non-Commanders fan who knows anything about the way football has worked for the last 15 years are gonna be very skeptical of this method.