- Messages
- 101,895
- Reaction score
- 112,883
That is just so wrong.If Tony was on the Steelers, he'd probably have a better shot.
That is just so wrong.If Tony was on the Steelers, he'd probably have a better shot.
Definitely.If Tony was on the Steelers, he'd probably have a better shot.
lol. That's why Tony wont get the media recognition because he (team) didn't succeed when he did play.
anyone asking why Marino is in the HOF should be banned from ever talking about football again.
He has won 50 percent of his playoff games
Both 07 and 14 came with a WR dropping the ball out giving up on route and RB fumblingYou really can't use the if he played on this other team he would of won Super Bowls. Would Archie Manning would of won Super Bowls if he played with the Steelers? Or Emmitt Smith would of Sucked if he played for the Saints? Who knows.. Dallas had two really good teams in Romo's tenure 2007 and 2014 and for whatever reason they didn't get it done..
Yep that's right I was thinking 2-4 record
SEAHAWKS-L
GIANTS-L
EAGLES-W
VIKINGS-L
LIONS-W
PACKERS-L
2-4 record (2 out of 6)
SEAHAWKS-L
GIANTS-L
EAGLES-W
VIKINGS-L
LIONS-W
PACKERS-L
2-4 record (2 out of 6)
If we'd won both of those games, it would have marked the only two times in in the playoffs since (at least) 1960 that a defense allowed over a 125 passer rating and won.Both 07 and 14 came with a WR dropping the ball out giving up on route and RB fumbling
If we'd won both of those games, it would have marked the only two times in in the playoffs since (at least) 1960 that a defense allowed over a 125 passer rating and won.
Mostly due to his team's poor defensive play. Three of the games on that list were Dallas losses with Romo at QB.Looks like Romo is the only QB on there with a rating over 125 in a playoff game that lost. Why does it always feel like hes always associated with weird stats like that?
If we'd won both of those games, it would have marked the only two times in in the playoffs since (at least) 1960 that a defense allowed over a 125 passer rating and won.
I'm just saying it would've made history. But I get your point, those games were tight.Defenses weren't good at all but was saying we had chances to win against giants and GB in those years
I'm just saying it would've made history. But I get your point, those games were tight.
I personally think Romo would trade the HOF for a super bowl ring. IMO Romo will need two rings to be considered. So much of the HOF is about perception and he has a lot of perception to overcome, regardless of its validity.
The more interesting discussion in my mind is whether Eli makes it into the HOF. He shouldn't IMO, but would he be the only two-time winning QB to not be in the HOF?
I personally think Romo would trade the HOF for a super bowl ring. IMO Romo will need two rings to be considered. So much of the HOF is about perception and he has a lot of perception to overcome, regardless of its validity.
The more interesting discussion in my mind is whether Eli makes it into the HOF. He shouldn't IMO, but would he be the only two-time winning QB to not be in the HOF?