Good question. I, on the other hand, can't fathom the injury angst nonsense.
Let's examine the "sound" premise that Romo will get injured if he plays. Using the premise, we place Romo in an actual regular season game and restrict his time on the field to two quarters. The potential for injury exists. The potential for anyone playing a contact sport in particular exists but I digress. The odds are actually heavy in Romo's favor that he would exit a single half of football uninjured.
What does this prove? In a word, squat. The potential for injury playing a contact sport would not decrease just like it does not lessen for any player (dang it I did it again). So, let's extend the premise and introduce a possible scenario.
It's the third quarter of a playoff game. Prescott suffers an injury and leaves the game indefinitely. Romo enters the game and gets tackled.
- If Romo gets up and finishes the game, it does not validate the non-injury he did not encounter in the half played during the regular season.
- If Romo gets carted off, the purpose and intent of the half of the regular season game that he completed unscathed would have been equally meaningless.
Why does this madness continue? I have no clue. Yes, Romo has suffered unfortunate injuries. That fact should not quantify an unsubstantiated belief that it's a certainty Romo would automatically be put in traction if a cat sneezes in the Bahamas.