Do not go out on Sunday and make any attempts to beat the Skins

The one positive if we do win is that we will be a little more 'free' in our choices with that 1st rounder. In other words we won't force ourselves to skip out on an impact player because they aren't positions you typically don't draft with the 4th pick in the draft. Like the logic could have went, "You don't take Khalil Mack with a #1. We need that pass rusher with all these awesome potential."
 
Cowboy_Shawn said:
Personally I don't care if they attempt to win the game because I've seen them attempt to win games all year and they usually come up woefully short.

I doubt this merry band of losers even score a TD......again.

So as far as I'm concerned they can go all in trying to beat the Commanders, but 4-12 is a virtual lock.
Click to expand...

What will bug me is that Garrett will turn ultra aggressive. All of the fourth downs he refused to go for all year, he will go for. All the long give up FG drives will suddenly be showcases for a go-for-broke spirit. I can so see that.
 
Alexander said:
What will bug me is that Garrett will turn ultra aggressive. All of the fourth downs he refused to go for all year, he will go for. All the long give up FG drives will suddenly be showcases for a go-for-broke spirit. I can so see that.
Click to expand...

Eh, I don't know. Schefter and others think his job is safe so there's no need to break protocol and actually coach with onions to impress uncle Jerry. Just play it close to the vest as usual.
 
Skins will be playing their starters. We'll be trotting out our 4th string QB and 3rd string WR.

Guess who has the advantage?
 
Eddie said:
Skins will be playing their starters. We'll be trotting out our 4th string QB and 3rd string WR.

Guess who has the advantage?
Click to expand...

And players for the Skins said they want to win to continue that momentum for the playoffs.
 
Eddie said:
Skins will be playing their starters. We'll be trotting out our 4th string QB and 3rd string WR.

Guess who has the advantage?
Click to expand...

The only real advantage they will have is that they will play their starting QB. They likely to rest several nicked up starters.
 
Cowboy_Shawn said:
Eh, I don't know. Schefter and others think his job is safe so there's no need to break protocol and actually coach with onions to impress uncle Jerry. Just play it close to the vest as usual.
Click to expand...

He knows his job is safe, but if he coaches the game aggressively and wins, he can claim that he beat the division champs twice and what a way to build for 2016.

If he was smart, and out to salvage some of his lost credibility, he will coach harder. It is just like him. Just like he suddenly got more aggressive taking over for Phillips when he sabotaged the offense prior to that. Never underestimate how he looks out for himself. He is pretty good at keeping the Teflon intact.
 
If we win, I'm all for just grabbing Elliot. Corner back and some of the other positions will take time to develop. I don't care about comparing where other RBs were drafted in years past or how historically rbs are not supposed to be drafted that high... we have a monster O-line, we had our best year behind a superb running game, so get the back that could return us to greatness.
 
fifaguy said:
Hard to see why a team that was good enough to go 12-4 last year should tank to jump up a couple of draft spots. This is not the Cowboys way, or at least it didn't use to be...
Click to expand...

What has been the "Cowboy way" for the last 20 years? Please enlighten me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 17 more.
Total: 1,735 (members: 117, guests: 1,618)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
466,181
Messages
13,921,382
Members
23,795
Latest member
Derekbsenior
Back
Top