CowboyChris33
Benched
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
Lets say the Boys are ahead in the 4th quarter and they blow the lead and lose and dont make the playoffs. Do you keep him around??
CowboyChris33;4335812 said:Lets say the Boys are ahead in the 4th quarter and they blow the lead and lose and dont make the playoffs. Do you keep him around??

A better question for you is, which one of these would hurt more?CowboyChris33;4335812 said:Lets say the Boys are ahead in the 4th quarter and they blow the lead and lose and dont make the playoffs. Do you keep him around??
MichaelWinicki;4335830 said:If Dallas gets beat 52-7, Garrett is retained.
No question.
UVAwahoos;4335826 said:He should have been promptly fired after the Arizona game.
Bring in Fisher and get out of the way.
5Stars;4335838 said:This was a stupid comment the first time you said it!
![]()
![]()
5Stars;4335838 said:This was a stupid comment the first time you said it!
![]()
![]()
CowboyChris33;4335812 said:Lets say the Boys are ahead in the 4th quarter and they blow the lead and lose and dont make the playoffs. Do you keep him around??
MichaelWinicki;4335850 said:Well... Yeah.
Like Fisher was some kind of "Playoff machine" while coaching the Titans.
146-120 doesn't knock my socks off.
At the moment, Jason Garrett has a better winning percentage.
Look it up.![]()
REDVOLUTION;4335853 said:In 5....4......3......2...........1
"but, but, but ownership never got him any good players. He did more with less than any other coach in the history of the world"
UVAwahoos;4335856 said:Fisher did pretty well with McNair, and I'm pretty confident that Romo is a better QB.
We don't need the best coach in the world. Just need someone who won't directly cost us games over and over again.
If Garrett doesn't blow the Arizona game, we're not even having this convo about the Giants right now...
