CATCH17
1st Round Pick
- Messages
- 67,669
- Reaction score
- 86,221
I don't really care is my answer. lol
Yep.. I was hoping that was an option.
I do not care.
I don't really care is my answer. lol
But I have been watching for 50 years so almost since the beginning give or take 8 or 9 years. I want them to win but everything else comes before football. Frustration is being married to the wrong spouse for 5 years. That easily trumps 25 years of not winning a sb. jmhohes not alone but 25 years of frustration will do that to some people
Yep. A well-constructed argument can be made that a descriptor like 'most' or similar can be realistically used concerning the subject, even with the typical undecided option included.UPDATE...…...as of 12:36 AM, only 44% of fans have selected "YES"
as much as I hate to say it, I don't. its not like we have a stable situation and perhaps catch fire like Giants did in their superbowl run. this is a freaking mess. a lame duck coach. a lame duck coaching staff. an owner who openly criticizes the coaches on camera. an owner who is openly looking for his next coach. a team that knows this coaching staff isn't going to be around and doesn't fear any punishment. a media circus. we have ZERO chance in the playoffs. ZERO. so for now, I hope we lose the next three games. I think the Rams are going to blow us out. even though we are favored. we will go on the road and lose a close one to eagles and then beat the skins at home. end up 7-9....that assures us a top 15 pick. as opposed to going to playoffs and ending up with the 21st pick.Some may wish going into more depth about their opinion but hopefully as many members as possible will cast their vote on the subject.
youre not wrong mine was a`17 year screw upBut I have been watching for 50 years so almost since the beginning give or take 8 or 9 years. I want them to win but everything else comes before football. Frustration is being married to the wrong spouse for 5 years. That easily trumps 25 years of not winning a sb. jmho
Yes
and i also want Garrett gone if he doesn’t bring home #6
You block people because you're a weak sort who can't handle differing thoughts. No big deal, but it's highly ironic that you'd declare it.I don't block people simply because they have a different opinion or perspective than mine, but since you've assumed that to be the case, don't bother responding. You know why.
Packers had a highly disruptive interior DLine w/ Raji and Cullen Jenkins and a top 5 D in the NFL. And that "horrible record" was 10-6. Bit of strong adjective for 10-6.you should always want your team to get in the playoffs. Anything can happen when you get in. Packers got in 2010 with a horrible record by defeating the Bears the last regular season game of the year. Then got hot and won the thing. It happens. And if you win the Super Bowl do you really care who is the GM or the coach.
No, I think it's more than 56% sadly.Only 44% has selected YES...……...do you really believe 56% of this board has a loser mentality?
Just because you cheer for the laundry no matter what, doesn't mean you should question the motives of those who dont.
I think some forget how long the offseason is. If we can watch them play in the playoffs and get one more game before that long offseason then why not. Maybe a nail biter. Or maybe we win. Maybe we lose. We have 3 games to get this going. At least root for your team to win.
Should I duck and run from the thread. Are y’all gonna throw batteries at me.
it was edited to Ware long ago...20 min. Guess it took that long to get your misinformed thoughts down. One thing I won’t do on this forum and it’s debate someone with a misinformed agenda or coming from a place of no knowledge whatsoever. Dense. That group consisted of a core that lasted into Wade making the playoffs. It was a massive upgrade. But you keep spouting your nonsense. It basically was a rebrand after Campo. Move along with some other gibberish
If you would have bothered reading this thread you would see virtually nobody said the draft was the reason they wanted to lose, instead it was they wanted to see change come to the organization in terms of new coaching, new schemes, ect. Many stated that they feared Jerry would use going to the playoff as an excuse to keep Garrett, thus preventing these new changes from happening.
Why dont you get down off your high horse of telling people to go root for another team and understand their point of view instead. Maybe you are like Pavlov dog that just cheers when he sees the star no matter what, but dont question the motives or fanhood of those that do not.
Besides, only 44% have selected YES...……...so you think 56% of this board should just go root for another team?
If you would have bothered reading this thread you would see virtually nobody said the draft was the reason they wanted to lose, instead it was they wanted to see change come to the organization in terms of new coaching, new schemes, ect. Many stated that they feared Jerry would use going to the playoff as an excuse to keep Garrett, thus preventing these new changes from happening.
Why dont you get down off your high horse of telling people to go root for another team and understand their point of view instead. Maybe you are like Pavlov dog that just cheers when he sees the star no matter what, but dont question the motives or fanhood of those that do not.
Besides, only 44% have selected YES...……...so you think 56% of this board should just go root for another team?
Yes it did take longer to reply because I actually looked up the stats for each of those players and going back to see if you changed your post just doesn't fly. All that shows is that you are easily confuse if two players have similar names or the same first names. It also show that you don't read very well because I did say those players were an upgrade from what the Cowboys had but where we differ is there is a difference between an upgrade and actually being stars and only 2 get credited by Parcells and we all know that it was Sean Payton who got Romo to Dallas. You need to learn the difference between an upgrade and bona fide stars.
.