i love jeanty and he's pretty darn good. but this is a really deep class for rb. there will be good guys in round 2 and also into round 3.My concern was the line more than Rico….we could have had Henry but would he be successful with this line earlier in the year? Our line play was bad, no matter the back. If that not improved consistently next year, may not matter who the back is. Question is can we get a back in round 3 that would work and take another position in 1 and 2, or get Jeanty if hes there and risk the bad line? Need to see what these linemen got the last few games. Maybe Rico get another couple 100yrd games
There are only 9 RBs in the league with a higher ypc.He's a JAG.
I'm curious why we continue to knock the run scheme when its been very effective for several weeks now? Other than just running the ball more frequently which I agree they need to do what needs to change schematically?There are only 9 RBs in the league with a higher ypc.
Running in a offense with a bad scheme and OL so banged up Matt Waletzko was the next man up last week.
Does that sound like a JAG to you?
Giants and Bengals defenses are awful.There are only 9 RBs in the league with a higher ypc.
Running in a offense with a bad scheme and OL so banged up Matt Waletzko was the next man up last week.
Does that sound like a JAG to you?
It will take more than a few million per year to sign him.Rico was never the problem. Contracts dictating starter status is the more direct correlation. Both the OL & RB group.
I don't care about lead back designations. I want multiple backs with good all around skill set that I can put in the game and expect production without compromising the playbook.