Right now the defense is ranked 29th in "time to throw" against this season at 2.54 seconds. The average is 2.35 seconds. They should already have the split second they need when compared to other teams.Now with a legit CB added - he might get that extra split second he needs.
So much so. Exactly.there is pressure, and then there is EFFECTIVE pressure
he also had a couple bowhead penalties tooSam Williams had a sack last night.
Exactly.Yeah pressure rate alone typically doesn’t tell the story. I want players creating pressure, but also need to know how quickly they’re getting pressure, how many guys are you sending, and how many blockers does the offense have? I mean you can get pressure 100% of the time if you send 6 guys vs 5OL
Exactly bro. Your first paragraph had myself and Thunderpimp in a deep discussion from last year's Dallas v. Packer game.As far as pressures, I just to know how many result in an incomplete pass, or even a check down below the sticks on 3rd. Your job as a rusher is to effect the passing game. If your non sack pressures arent doing that, what good are they
I will add that for young players like Ezeiruaku and Lawrence, it can be a way to chart growth. Unfortunately for us right now, Ezeiruaku is our best rusher. He is on pace for 6 sacks generously (thats counting an half sack as a full btw). Thats not going to cut it
Pressures allowed for OT's is a better use of the stat
It’s a tough one. Sometimes pressures are extremely valuable, sometimes not. I do hope the advanced metric industry moves away from generic “pressure rates” and back to the breakdown of Hurries/hits/sacks model. An all encompassing stat is easier to share on twitter though so I doubt that happens.Exactly.
Your explanation here and our previous discussions on pressures give me pause on pressures as a stat in general.
I remember our one past discussion on quick pressure win rate and whether the outcome of the play should be considered when crediting a pressure.
To me, this metric lacks genuine consistency and a clearly defined explanation as to what is and isn't a pressure.
With all of this said, its just my own personal opinion that the subjectivity variable is just too broad when PFF tries to measure pressures. It's like a gray area stat to me.
My opinion.
Raw pressures might matter against weak or young QB's. To emphasize @gtb1943 point, and experienced Pro Bowl caliber CB isnt going to be effected because he know where the ball is going and its out his hands before he feels any pressure. Guys like that you need to either out down or get to them fast enough to where they check it downExactly bro. Your first paragraph had myself and Thunderpimp in a deep discussion from last year's Dallas v. Packer game.
To put it simply while Micah practically lived in the Dallas backfield kfield and set some kind of record for pressures, Dak still got rid of it too quickly and dropped 40 points on them.
Where's the credibility in that?
That's what I said.
The funny thing was after being denied all game long in that game Micah did finally get a sack on Dak at the most crucial moment to prevent a Cowboy TD in OT and allowing Crosby the chance for the game ending and tying FG.
The actual sack was the difference in a tie and a loss.
Not all the pressures.
Yep, you're on the same page as me bro. It's like you mentioned earlier that there should be some "outcome of the play" taken into consideration to give the stat any value.Raw pressures might matter against weak or young QB's. To emphasize @gtb1943 point, and experienced Pro Bowl caliber CB isnt going to be effected because he know where the ball is going and its out his hands before he feels any pressure. Guys like that you need to either out down or get to them fast enough to where they check it down
And he also got a penalty on the same play that nullified his sack.Sam Williams had a sack last night.
Maybe a turnover but id take the yardage lost and down.I respect pressures i just push back on people pretending they areas good as sacks. All pressures aren't equal.
