Doug Free

zrinkill;3105994 said:
Nobody believes you want that either.

I do care about that because I hope we meet, so please message me if your in my area ever.
 
For a good time, visit

622 West Seale Nacogdoches Texas.

1000 sailors can't be wrong.:D
 
Wow, this thread is descending toward idiocy, thanks to Tunahelper and his limited grasp of simple math or reality. I love it when one moron thinks he is right despite all evidence to the contrary. :lmao2:

Free is playing really well right now. He is not Columbo but he is playing solid. We may have a future fixture at tackle with him. However, I want to see how he does against the Giants, that is always a tough assignment.
 
Phrozen Phil;3105999 said:
For a good time, visit

622 West Seale Nacogdoches Texas.

1000 sailors can't be wrong.:D

4 of his boyfriends are with him in this thread.
 
esloan;3106002 said:
Wow, this thread is descending toward idiocy, thanks to Tunahelper and his limited grasp of simple math or reality. I love it when one moron thinks he is right despite all evidence to the contrary. :lmao2:

Free is playing really well right now. He is not Columbo but he is playing solid. We may have a future fixture at tackle with him. However, I want to see how he does against the Giants, that is always a tough assignment.

What math is incorrect?
 
tunahelper;3106000 said:
You never did come back on my previous questions?

Because you chose not to acknowledge doesn't mean I didn't respond.

Of the 58 runs how many went to left tackle?
 
cowboyz;3106008 said:
http://profootballfocus.com/gstats.php?tab=by_week&season=2009&wk=11&teamid=9&gameid=1540&stats=o

they haven't rated the raiders game yet.

but in the Commanders game, they had free has average run blocking ie won/loss about the same, and above average in pass blocking.

only problem with that site is ratliff's rating. have no idea what they're looking at.

http://profootballfocus.com/by_player.php?tab=by_player&season=2009&surn=Ratliff&playerid=2441

That is about what I thought he did, average. My point is I think he could have done better against the backups he was facing.
 
tunahelper;3105975 said:
I also stated my 90% was a guess and 73% was shown to be the real number. So I was off by 17%.

Wrong yet again, no matter how many times you repeat it. The number was 64%, since your 90% "guess" was about how often we ran left and up the middle, not how often we ran anywhere other than the right end.
 
NinePointOh;3106025 said:
Wrong yet again. The number was 64%, since your "guess" was about how often we ran left and up the middle, not how often we ran anywhere other than the right end.

I stopped this fight 5 pages ago and yet the whooping continues.
 
The Realist;3106030 said:
I stopped this fight 5 pages ago and yet the whooping continues.

If it continues, then there will be spankings all the way round.:p:
 
Phrozen Phil;3106033 said:
If it continues, then there will be spankings all the way round.:p:



This is certainly one of the worst beatings I've witnessed on this board. :D
 
Childish arguments aside, I'd still like to hear a clip of the Verizon Wireless Post Game show with Larry Brown where I called in praising the play of Doug Free. If he doesn't play well, or at least good, then our offense struggles for sure.

Glad to have you here, Mr. Free.
 
NinePointOh;3105703 said:
38% have gone to the right side, 36% have gone to the middle, and 26% have gone to the left side. You could have said 62% to the left/middle, but that doesn't really help your case since that encompasses two-thirds of the offensive line and accounts for fewer than two-thirds of our rushing attempts. I could just as easily say 74% have gone to the right/middle.

I think the point of this is that we're pretty balanced in our run calls, with more going to the right side than any other area, which would mean among the three areas (left, middle, right) we can run we're running the most to the side of the new guy.

Adding two parts (the middle and the left) together to prove we're running less to the right is an unfair way to look at it. That would be like adding the right and middle together to say we run 74 percent of our plays away from Flozell Adams. There are three directions we can run, and we ran to the right more than either of the others.

I have always wondered why we tend to go to the right side more than the left (which remains the case even with Free in). I think it's because we want to run behind Leonard Davis and have Kyle Kosier pull. Of course, it seems like Barber usually bounces his plays to the right.

Nice work on the stats.
 
LOL! I love it in these threads when people say "I went back and watched the whole game, focusing only on certain players" to try and prove their points. I doubt, very seriously, that any of these people actually go back and watch anything.

And if you do...wow. I'm sorry but that makes you quite silly. Unless you're getting paid to watch game film the fact that you actually went back and rewatched entire games, just to focus on what a certain player does, is just...wow.
 
BraveHeartFan;3106312 said:
LOL! I love it in these threads when people say "I went back and watched the whole game, focusing only on certain players" to try and prove their points. I doubt, very seriously, that any of these people actually go back and watch anything.

And if you do...wow. I'm sorry but that makes you quite silly. Unless you're getting paid to watch game film the fact that you actually went back and rewatched entire games, just to focus on what a certain player does, is just...wow.


I do it for every single game we play and do it because I love it and love to observe the nuances of the game. After we play games, I'm excited to get the download (I'm actually anxiously waiting for mine to complete right now) and do this very thing.

Some of us just like the game for what it is, not just following the ball from the QB's hands to the WR. What's so wrong with that?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,576
Messages
13,819,719
Members
23,780
Latest member
HoppleSopple
Back
Top