Down by 3 with 4 minutes left, can QC....

boysfanindc said:
They either don't trust QC to not make a mistake or they believe in him enough to do it again.

Which is it?
Click to expand...


They probably wanted two shots at the FG incase of a bad snap. If there's a bad snap you take the ball and throw it out of bounds. You still have time to attempt another. Not a bad call, but I would of thrown one in the endzone anyway.
 
How the HELL is this LOSER KELLY GREGG getting to the QB so easily? He almost jsut won the game for the Ravens.


That awesome OL isn't looking so awesome at the moment.
 
Buckley was beat, but luckily the pass was underthrown. Close to being a penalty, but a good noncall IMO.
 
Could Terrel Buckley have helped Dallas this season or not?

He was one guy not asking a king's ransom for a contract, either.
 
LaTunaNostra said:
Could Terrel Buckley have helped Dallas this season or not?

He was one guy not asking a king's ransom for a contract, either.
Click to expand...

Anyone could of helped us.

QC throwing the ball away when he should.
 
Hackett needs to give QC some more protection. The Ravens are blitzing and they aren't picking it up.
 
That's the game.


QC played well, but as usual, Hackett can't make second half adjustments.
 
BIg tackle for about a 3 yard loss. That's a 51 yard FG attempt from right there. It's not quite over yet. Gonna be close.
 
Amazing. People criticize QC's accuracy (and he does need to improve) but he's more accurate then first rounder Kyle Boller and nobody criticizes him.



Gonna be about a 45 yarder or so. Stover won't miss from there.
 
Coaching & Mistakes.

Having Jordan throw when QC and CM passing and running well was a 14 point turn around.

Also special teams cost them as well as personal foul penalties.
 
Well win or lose it was a typical QC performance. You can never get an impressive 4 quarters out of him (or he'd have lead an offense to 4 TD's more than once in his 32 starts), but hey as long as he doesnt give the game away it's considered a success. The king of movin it some tween the 20's and ending up with 17 to match his number. Nothing wrong with that though. He simply is what he is.

But yeah, I get it. If they'd have won it would've been because of a wonderful game by Carter, but since they lost it's due to coaching and other things.
 
DipChit said:
Well win or lose it was a typical QC performance. You can never get an impressive 4 quarters out of him (or he'd have lead an offense to 4 TD's more than once in his 32 starts), but hey as long as he doesnt give the game away it's considered a success. The king of movin it some tween the 20's and ending up with 17 to match his number. Nothing wrong with that though. He simply is what he is.

But yeah, I get it. If they'd have won it would've been because of a wonderful game by Carter, but since they lost it's due to coaching and other things.
Click to expand...

They guy that throw a interception in the end zone that cost the jets a 14 point turn around was Jordan, after QC and CM drove them down the field.

But your right that was QC fault, should of never ran the play the coach called.
 
boysfanindc said:
They guy that throw a interception in the end zone that cost the jets a 14 point turn around was Jordan, after QC and CM drove them down the field.

But your right that was QC fault, should of never ran the play the coach called.
Click to expand...

Thats funny, in the Jets game I was watching that play happened in the first half. How many points did the Jets score in the 2nd half and OT?
 
They should not have had to score any. They should of been up by 21.

Plus they took the ball out of his hands on 3rd down at the 4.
 
The TRUE hates showin' up now.


Yeah, QCs fault cuz they couldn't score more then 17 against the best defense in the NFL (eventhough they would of had AT LEAST 3 more points if not for that dumb call by Hackett).
 
Rack said:
The TRUE hates showin' up now.


Yeah, QCs fault cuz they couldn't score more then 17 against the best defense in the NFL (eventhough they would of had AT LEAST 3 more points if not for that dumb call by Hackett).
Click to expand...

Told you, they were waiting for something to blame carter for, 17 against the Best D in the league not to mention the int by the running back which should have been at least 3.

Curious dipchit..... how many points did we score against the cinci?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 17 more.
Total: 3,167 (members: 117, guests: 3,050)

Forum statistics

Threads
463,822
Messages
13,771,939
Members
23,768
Latest member
Versatile1988
Back
Top