Check the TOP, it's not like the defense was on the field for a ridiculous amount of time. Also, you said that the defense was tired of bailing the offense out, not that they were tired. What you said implied that they just gave up.
In all honesty, it doesn't matter what a team does through 3 quarters, it matters what they do through 4. The offense put up 24 points on a team that allowed an average of 15 per game. Only 4 other opponents scored 20+ on Baltimore this year, 3 of them won. The offense scored enough points. It doesn't matter if the majority came in the 4th quarter, points in the 4th are worth just as much as points at any other point in the game. Or would you be happier if we had scored 7 in the first, 3 in the second, 7 in the third and 7 in the fourth? It doesn't matter, we still would have lost.
That game is on the defense, not the offense, not Garrett.
1. My mistake on the english, but I think it is obvious I meant the defense was tired. You don't play 3 and a half quarters of damn good football, just to quit on two drives.
2. BS... the game was on the offense... 6 of those minutes of TOP came only on one drive for the Cowboys and that was in the 4th... Those TOPs came late in the game, and I don't care how you try and deny it... This team had 5 3 and outs, which is just plain awful and during the 2nd and third quarters, almost one after the other. If it wasn't a 3 and out, it was a 4 drive series, ending in a punt or INT. There five play series were just as pathetic. One series after the other, the offense didn't do jack squat, while Baltrimore systematically ran the ball and chewed up the clock, while Garrett chose to fling the ball downfiled, over and over again. A team that continually pounds away, wears the front four down. You can't dispute it.. It was a consistent staple with this offense.
Out of those 24 points, 14 of them were from no huddle and it happened like that against the Eagles as well. When the Cowboys wnet no-huddle, the coaching of Garrett was reduced to a minimum and the Cowboys marched down the field. They had to rely on a option to Witten on the fly, with a pass to TO as well. The only difference between it and the Ravens game was that the fast-paced resulted in two fumbles by the Cowboys. That type of 'offense' is what you get with the Cowboys, because there coaching is horrible on offense. One week they may score, the next week, Romo's feet runs right into the heart of protection, and he gets hit, causing a fumble.
BTW, the Ravens were playing prevent during that time, and they are known to give up points like that at the end of games..
It does matter when the points come. Like I said, and you simply ignored, how many times did you see Emmitt break his long runs in the 4th quarter, despite the opposing defenses knowing it was coming?
It is all on Garrett.. That is a fact, and Romo called him out, TO called him out, and even Newman called him out...
Garrett sucks plain and simple...