Ed Werder: Reducing Daks role in the offense!

To reduce his role, you have to have a dominate OL and 2 very, very good RBs and a number 2 WR that other teams have to fear somewhat. Pretty large order for 1 draft and 1 off season and doubtful Jerry and Stephen view it the same way.
 
Jerry paying Dak that ludicrous contract, making him the highest player in the NFL certainly does not mean that Dak is anywhere close to being the best player in the league let alone the best QB in the league.
Everyone knows Dak doesn't deserve the money he gets. The optics still aren't great. He could've done something like Brady did and not take the highest contract just because of ego.
 
To reduce his role, you have to have a dominate OL and 2 very, very good RBs and a number 2 WR that other teams have to fear somewhat. Pretty large order for 1 draft and 1 off season and doubtful Jerry and Stephen view it the same way.
Not hard but there has to be some effort and a want to be good
 
Nobody really thinks these things through. The big complaint was that Moore never ran the ball, but then give him an offensive line that can run block and Barkley and he has a 2000 yard back. Suddenly he is committed to the run.

Our OL hasn’t been able to get a push on the LOS for years and so running has been ineffective. So we have to pass. But since we can’t run, we face less favorable passing environments.

Running game has actually looked better without Martin, which is crazy to say. Steele hasn’t been the same since injury. Rookie on the left side and center, though they have both gotten better as the year progressed. Dowdle has been fine actually.

McCarthy has been relying on a quick passing game to compensate. If we were more effective at running we would run more. Maybe next we can and if we do the story will be about reducing Dak’s role but that would be the wrong interpretation. We aren’t overusing Dak by choose but necessity.
 
What does this have to do with the current offense failing? How does Romo figure in this or somehow absolve horrific QB play today? This is like claiming that because Leon Lett screwed up back in the day it's all good if we screw up today.
Answer the question. I dare you.
 
The defense is always bad. Bad defense. They allowed a score how dare they. I'm still waiting for you to explain how the defense being bad somehow means the offense can just mail it in for half the game?
We already know what Dak is and what he can do.

Imagine fielding a good but not great defense and expecting Dak to level up in the postseason. No I dont expect Dak to lead us to a win vs a good team with a "good" defensive performance from our defense. If you do then my point about low football iq is accurate
 
Yeah, can't trust the highest paid NFL player to do his job. No one should expect him to actually carry the team or anything.
That's because he can't, he is mental and broken down, and it's only going to get worse.
 
Jerry paying Dak that ludicrous contract, making him the highest player in the NFL certainly does not mean that Dak is anywhere close to being the best player in the league let alone the best QB in the league.
He is not even the best player on the team!
 
Dak and Jerry/Stephen think he is elite. There's no way they would ever turn Dak into a bus driver and run an offense like with Rush. That's why it doesn't matter how great the OL or RB is, Dak will still want to throw it 40 times a game.
 
What does this have to do with the current offense failing? How does Romo figure in this or somehow absolve horrific QB play today? This is like claiming that because Leon Lett screwed up back in the day it's all good if we screw up today.
You are somewhat new around this forum, you will get to know AC's tactics soon enough. You say something about Dak, AC tries to turn it into a Romo discussion = deflection that does not work.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,037
Messages
13,785,296
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top