Austin28 said:
Oh, I guess I was at another board and someone said you didn't honor the full terms of the bet; or something like the avatar you had wasn't the one the winner of the bet wanted you to have ...
Maybe that was just a misunderstanding -who knows.
Let's look at the unfolding of this never ending spin control.
Your first shot in this thread was a pointed shot at me. Post #161 of the thread. Here's the jab directed at me.
BnA said:
Some guy on here, who says he's never been wrong about a pedigree QB, promised me that this Henson guy was 'the future'
Everyone here knows that QB pedigree is my schtick. I don't remember ever discussing it with you, though you clearly say I "promised" you this. The post further goes on to praise two posters who have indeed been in discussions with me about Henson. I've promised nothing but let's not get facts in the way of a good story.
Translation, you miss the attention and feel the need to prod an old adversary, me. I'm flattered.
Moving on to post #165...
Ben said:
At least the staff of this board has eliminated the objectiveness from this "debate"
What have we here? A shot at this forum by someone who's never been banned here but has loyalty to two guys who have? That's the story you want to run with? I was born at night, but it wasn't last night.
Translation, I don't buy that you've got a loyal fan Ben who would suddenly take up your old battles. You talked one guy, NoShameInMyGame, into coming here one time to do your dirty work. Don't try to claim that's the username you forgot. I already checked.
Moving on, post #256...
Ben said:
I think you even lost a bet last year... Romo ended up wearing the #2 crown last year; you wore the avatar as a result, remember?... Do you want to make a friendly bet for this year, regarding the #2 spot?
Here you know that I had a bet. Why do you know this? Because the bet was with you. You know all about the Romo avatar because you whined about it on another forum even though you know I wouldn't have done the same if I had ended up winning the bet later. You demanded payment when all the parameters of the bet were impossible and I paid up. Big deal. I wasn't hurt or humiliated so quit thinking your feather is so beautiful. I paid up for one reason, and one reason only, and it had nothing to do with you.
On top of this, you also offer to make the same bet this year. Yeah, no agenda there Ben. Not at all transparent either.
Moving on again. Post #287...
Ben said:
Well even if they are clearly spelled out, some people like to make up their own parameters after they lose
First of all this is an outright lie and you know it. I have to wonder, since you claim you aren't Ben over and over, why you'd take this stance if you aren't?
You clearly question my integrity here and lie to do it. Why would a perfect stranger do this about a bet he knows nothing about? That math doesn't add up. The funniest thing is that after this you start to pretend you really don't know anything about the bet. You know nothing about it, but can claim the parameters changed? Yeah right.
Here's an interesting claim. Post #302...
Ben said:
Actually, neither. I've been a reader of this site for a while. Then I didn't post here much in the offseason. When I came back, I forgot the username, password and even the email address I used to register for this site.
We have Guidelines against multiple usernames. We'll address this soon and get back to you. We also have Guidelines about banned posters coming back. We'll address that too. But I digress.
Later in that post you bring up the bet again. Clearly this bet is really important to you. But you didn't make the original bet right? Riiiiiight.
Moving on. Post #306...
Ben said:
Kind of like how you knew who was going to be the #2 guy last year.
You aren't Ben, but his cause is all important. I'm guessing brown eyes, genetics have nothing to do with it.
Now let's watch you try and spin control after multiple posters identify you. Post #315.
Ben said:
I vaguely remember the bet thread or other details other than the bet and the terms of it
That's funny. You accuse me of a lot of stuff for something you now "vaguely" remember.
Now watch the back tracking as I point out you're changing your stance again. Post #317...
Ben said:
I honestly didn't know if you did or didn't. I think I remember hearing both things from somewhere
Nice try. You've been adamant for how many posts?
And the final lie so far. Post #319...
Ben said:
Oh, I guess what talking about was I was at another board and someone said you didn't honor the full terms of the bet; or something like the avatar you had wasn't the one the winner of the bet wanted you to have ...
Maybe that was just a misunderstanding -who knows.
You want to stick with this glob of fiction or come clean?