Enough already on this HENSON dude

superpunk said:
For god's sake - someone hide the children!

But first, put on some popcorn and pop me a beer... this is gettin' entertaining... :D
 
Little Jr said:
Just another post of the ones who dont believe in Henson have agendas and are bias. The ones who do are actually watching his games and are evaluating his games and think the others have no clue.


Dont see it in Henson= Agenda

See something in Henson= watching and evaluating his games and the other side has no clue and have agendas.

Typical.

What is causing this isn't someone stating an opinion that they don't think Henson has it, they don't/you don't fine, it's an OPINION. We all have one, no biggy when stated as such.

What is the problem is they aren't just stating an opinion.

They are fabricating, misrepresenting and stating that as FACT.

Further in doing this most of them HAVE NOT EVEN WATCHED THE RHEIN GAMES, so their opinion...while they are entitled to it...is a misinformed one.

Hell we still have to keep correcting the Henson played 8 games in college nonsense 3 years later, AND THAT IS THE ISSUE.
 
Hostile said:
Yeah right you weren't questioning my integrity with that crap. That's right it was crap. You were clueless about whether I have integrity with regards to paying bets. You intimated that I don't and that the parameters need finite detail so I won't welch. That's why I mentioned the bets. I don't and won't welch. If that bugs you take a Tums.

Speaking of things that apparently bug you, my owning a Harley has really chapped your butt for some stupid reason which I am blissfully unaware of. Why? Do you have stock in Triumph, BMW or someone else? I don't get why this is such an issue with you that you need to keep reminding me about it. Do you want me to apologize for it? Hey I own a rare shotgun too. I've got a great marriage. Not a good marriage, a great one. Two nice kids too. Should I just apologize for everything nice that I have or have had in my life? Stuff that I worked for and earned BTW.

In other words Charles, if you want to get any more personal than this do it via PM and call me out where I can respond like I want to. Until then shut your festering gob.
:lmao: :lmao2: You take yourself too seriously:lmao2:
 
Charles said:
Make sure the bet is detailed and the parameters are clearly spelled out:lmao2:


Well even if they are clearly spelled out, some people like to make up their own parameters after they lose. ;)
 
For those of us that listen to Sportstalk 980.

"That's a manhood issue right there, son..." Doc Walker.
 
Austin28 said:
Well even if they are clearly spelled out, some people like to make up their own parameters after they lose. ;)
You're lying Ben. You just said I paid up a few posts ago. Now the story changes. And you wonder why every site bans you.
 
Hostile said:
You're lying Ben. You just said I paid up a few posts ago. Now the story changes. And you wonder why every site bans you.

ben - bannedinaustin - gotcha now. wondering how 50someodd posts knew our history so well. : )

and did you try to send someone to detox earlier???? HOW DARE YOU cast me your rejects! : )
 
BigDFan5 said:
There is an awful lot of "last year" in a post from a guy who joined last month. isn't that right BnA

Um, I'm not BnA. I'm from Austin, but that doesn't mean I'm banned_n_austin.

I have been around and reading this site for a while though and I'm looking foarward to the 2006 season and talking a little football here as well. I don't have time to rack up thousands of posts, but I do like to stir the pot a little. That's what makes it fun.
 
Funxva said:
Wasn't Warner bagging groceries or something at a point?

*lightbulb flashes*

We should sign every grocery bagger who can throw a football. :D
 
Charles said:
:lmao: :lmao2: You take yourself too seriously:lmao2:

Some folks are not amused at attacks on their personal integrity... this is generally because they prize their reputation for integrity, and try to nurture it...
 
silverbear said:
Some folks are not amused at attacks on their personal integrity... this is generally because they prize their reputation for integrity, and try to nurture it...
Thank you.
 
superpunk said:
For those of us that listen to Sportstalk 980.

"That's a manhood issue right there, son..." Doc Walker.
Doc is great he's even better as a color anaylist for College football games, his describtions and euphuisms are great.

I am just amused at how Hos interpreted my post. Thats one of the downfalls of forums, an innocent question or remark can lead to all kinds of interpretations because of my past post.

For example we somewhat disagreed on the 2TE discussion, does that mean I shoud view the rest of your posts differently or in a negative way. :lmao2:
 
silverbear said:
Some folks are not amused at attacks on their personal integrity... this is generally because they prize their reputation for integrity, and try to nurture it...
Well quite frankly I don't give a **** how Hos takes it. In my heart I know I wasn't questioning his intergrity, but I am getting a kick out of him playing internet tough guy.

I do envy him.........honestly I wish I had a great marriage
 
Hostile said:
Thank you.

You've had my back before, Hos, it's only fair that I take up for you here... besides, I have been known to get a mite worked up when folks assail my honesty too...

I'm vulgar, opinionated, in your face, but nobody can honestly say that I'm not a straight shooter... delete the vulgar bit, and that could describe you as well...

Anyway, I know where you were coming from...
 
Charles said:
Well quite frankly I don't give a **** how Hos takes it. In my heart I know I wasn't questioning his intergrity,

Then all you had to do was tell him that, and the whole thing would have died rather quickly... but like I said, Hos isn't the only guy out there who will react strongly when they perceive that their integrity is being challenged...

Communicating via the written word lacks context that the spoken word can convey (which is the reason I use caps to emphasize words that would have been emphasized via vocal inflection if we were speaking face to face), and words are often misinterpreted... it's happened to me to, resulting in me ultimately apologizing to the poster that I'd misjudged...
 
Charles said:
Well quite frankly I don't give a **** how Hos takes it. In my heart I know I wasn't questioning his intergrity, but I am getting a kick out of him playing internet tough guy.

I do envy him.........honestly I wish I had a great marriage
I'd like to know how I've done this.

Have I threatened you in this thread or via PMs? Nope.

You absolutely did question my integrity. We both know it. Had I innocently offended someone I'd be man enough to apologize. You haven't attempted to. In other words, the offense was intentional. So don't play innocent.
 
silverbear said:
You've had my back before, Hos, it's only fair that I take up for you here... besides, I have been known to get a mite worked up when folks assail my honesty too...

I'm vulgar, opinionated, in your face, but nobody can honestly say that I'm not a straight shooter... delete the vulgar bit, and that could describe you as well...

Anyway, I know where you were coming from...
Thank you again.

FYI, if I win the tickets from RiggoForever you're coming to that game with me.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,093
Messages
13,788,514
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top