Boyzmamacita
CowBabe Up!!!
- Messages
- 29,047
- Reaction score
- 64,100
:laugh2:187beatdown;2797527 said:Eli was still Eli without Plaxico. Only this time, when he overthrew a ball, there was no one big enough to catch it.
:laugh2:187beatdown;2797527 said:Eli was still Eli without Plaxico. Only this time, when he overthrew a ball, there was no one big enough to catch it.
MWILL;2797540 said:Exactly! There were no other WR's that made Eli look good.
You would know this how? As was already pointed out, Sparano's duties with the Cowboys was OL and the running game.Alexander;2797510 said:I think Sparano rode him hard. I most certainly believe Romo needs that since success came to him so quick. I don't believe he responds well to kid gloves. He needs to be pushed, challenged and reminded where he comes from.
He also misses Chris Palmer and David Lee. Wade Wilson has done him no favors.
speedkilz88;2797576 said:You would know this how?
As was already pointed out, Sparano's duties with the Cowboys was OL and the running game.
Boyzmamacita;2797559 said:I think Romo can look good without T.O. We will miss TO's production, but Romo has great rapport with Witten and good rapport with Crayton. The little bit we saw from Austin and Bennett is promising and don't count out Sam Hurd as a contributor. And yes, the running game will help Romo immensely. Garrett will find a way to utilize the three-headed monster at RB. He's not the dummy everybody is making him out to be. The O line is the question, but assuming that Flo is healthy again and Kosier or Holland can step it up, we'll be better up front than last year. The defense will be led by Wade from the start (a good thing) and the special teams will be vastly improved. Stories of the Cowboys demise are premature.
Alexander;2797510 said:I think Sparano rode him hard. I most certainly believe Romo needs that since success came to him so quick. I don't believe he responds well to kid gloves. He needs to be pushed, challenged and reminded where he comes from.
He also misses Chris Palmer and David Lee. Wade Wilson has done him no favors.
that's what i'm afraid ofMWILL;2797521 said:I think Dallas just turned into the Giants (offensively)
Eli wasn't Eli without Plaxico.
juckie;2797316 said:If it was TO of 5 years ago,id say yes.Not now,TO is more worried about his acting career and selling stuff,the guy is older now.That being said RW11 kinda sucks,terrible trade so far.I think he is a glorified Keyshawn Johnson.
thats the problem with your offense late in the season and moneytime,it depends to much on romo buying time..when teams figure you out late in the season,romo's ability to create gets cut drastically and what he does well is not a advantage to you anymore..the bigger the game the less romo's escape ability have a impact..That should be a major concern for you cowboy fans..Idgit;2797305 said:"JC: Matt, I don't know what this "trust" thing really is. It's a talent thing. The only thing I question is the thought that T.O.'s departure will allow Romo to get back to throwing to the open receiver. Defenses can take Witten and Williams out of being open with double coverage. If that happens, the running game advantage will be only marginal and Romo may not have anybody open. Ultimately, the Cowboys will be better without T.O. but I just think they are going to struggle this year because the drop-off is too vast from T.O. to Crayton or to Austin. If I'm right, you might be blogging more playoff games in Philadelphia or at Giants Stadium than Jerry Jones' new digs in Big D. "
Whatever the impact, if they double Witten and double Roy, the impact on the running game will be more than 'marginal,' and Romo will buy time and most definitely have somebody open.
We'll see if RW can make defenders double him with regularity.
Re: Romo not respecting coaches: anybody with any access to the team hear any word of this? Is it anything more than the fact that Romo had significant respect for Parcels because he's a strong personality and a HoF coach? Is there really any issue with disrespect? I know Romo's commented in the past that Garrett's a 'good kid,' but I took that in stride at the time. I find it hard to give credit to, but Mosely does have sources and doesn't make stuff up wholesale.
skinswin;2797656 said:thats the problem with your offense late in the season and moneytime,it depends to much on romo buying time..when teams figure you out late in the season,romo's ability to create gets cut drastically and what he does well is not a advantage to you anymore..the bigger the game the less romo's escape ability have a impact..That should be a major concern for you cowboy fans..
Rampage;2797601 said:that's what i'm afraid of
I wanted #81 gone. I'm some what confident in Roy #11. But Romo is a big ? to me right now without #81.MWILL;2797667 said:I thought you wanted #81 gone.
Or are you worried that Dallas didn't get a suitable replacement for T.O.
41gy#;2797710 said:The Cowboys have as much or more talent than any team in the NFL.
There isn't a talent problem in Dallas.
There are plenty of weapons on this team, and teams such as the Titans have won with far less.
Apollo Creed;2797715 said:The Titans are a talented team defensively, and they run the ball extremely well. A real QB and a talented WR could put them over the hump.
I know many will disagree, and that's fine, but there are some good points here.THUMPER;2797315 said:I'm just counting on my fingers here but I don't see the problem, in fact I hope teams DO try to double both Williams and Witten. That would mean Jones & Barber will have a field day! So Romo doesn't throw for 4000+ yards, I think a more balanced offense would take us farther anyway.
Also, it's not like Owens was catching 100+ passes for 1800 yards folks. He only caught 69 last year for just over 1000 yards. That is not very difficult to replace IMO. Williams has had as good a season as Owens best year here (with half the TDs though) so I don't see the reason for all this hand-wringing about Owens being gone.
Rampage;2797671 said:I wanted #81 gone. I'm some what confident in Roy #11. But Romo is a big ? to me right now without #81.
Apollo Creed;2797692 said:Romo's plus 60 completition percentage is incredible considering how often he throws under pressure and how many times our receivers have dropped very catchable balls.
Every route Owens ran was designed for the big play. Those routes demanded longer drops, making Romo more vulnerable. We are going to be a more timing based, possession oriented passing game this year. Keep Romo upright and healthy - and protect him down the stretch. Our offensive line and coaching staff hasn't done that thus far. Garrett constantly dialing up long winded routes for a receiver that takes a while to get going was a recipe for disaster.
A healthy Miles Austin to stretch the field, and an 'inspired' Roy Williams will suffice. But I still wish we would've grabbed another young speedy WR similar to Terry Glenn. Outside of Witten, TG was the only receiver I can say that Romo 'trusted'. I can't say that Romo had any chemistry with Owens because you never really knew where he would be on any given route - unless he was running a double move to get loose, or a deep crossing route. Everything else he ran was very mediocre. His hands between the hashes were suspect and he dissapeared in big games.
We're gonna miss his big plays and the matchup problems he created, but our offense needed continuity. Owens couldn't provide that on a weekly basis when we needed him to.
Romo is the least of my worries. I'm more worried about Flo holding up another full season.
Apollo Creed;2797692 said:Every route Owens ran was designed for the big play. Those routes demanded longer drops, making Romo more vulnerable.