News: ESPN: Dwayne Harris' penalty a curious call to Cowboys

NewsBot

New Member
Messages
111,281
Reaction score
2,947
ARLINGTON, Texas -- The NFL has attempted to make the game safer by protecting players from unnecessary hits. Sometimes, however, it seems the game has changed too much. Take Dwayne Harris' unnecessary roughness penalty in the fourth quarter on a punt return. Instead of allowing Nolan Carroll II the chance to down the kick deep in Dallas territory, Harris blocked him and a scuffle ensued between the two teams. Here’s Jason Garrett’s explanation: “My understanding of the rule is that if you don’t have a fair-catch signal, you can hit the guy.

Continue reading...
 

mahoneybill

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,912
Reaction score
4,528
Yeah the referees the last two games have been terrible. Hasn't changed the outcome, but still terrible.

To me that's why every play should be challengeable. I know it may make the games a little longer, but enough of this incompetence...
 

Big D

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,203
Reaction score
3,860
I thought it was a legal play myself. If he doesn't hit him the player is free to down the ball and pin us back against the goalline.
 

Nova

Ntegrase96
Messages
10,699
Reaction score
12,658
Thank you. Tried to start a thread on this but for some reason cannot start threads... Weird.

Perfectly legal, perfectly clean hit. Did not understand the call at all. Had no bearing on the game. Just another annoyance.
 

Nova

Ntegrase96
Messages
10,699
Reaction score
12,658
Yeah the referees the last two games have been terrible. Hasn't changed the outcome, but still terrible.

True. Still have to wonder how the game would've gone had the cowboys been able to respond with a strong opening drive. But it was thwarted by the refs complete ineptness to know what pass interference is even when it was a text book example.
 

TrailBlazer

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,841
Reaction score
3,525
This is a rule that could apply..

Article 8 There shall be no unnecessary roughness. This shall include, but will not be limited to:

...
(e) unnecessarily running, diving into, cutting, or throwing the body against or on a player who (i) is out of
the play or (ii) should not have reasonably anticipated such contact by an opponent, before or after
the ball is dead...



It's the crap rules guys. The game has been going this way for awhile
 

Nova

Ntegrase96
Messages
10,699
Reaction score
12,658
This is a rule that could apply..

Article 8 There shall be no unnecessary roughness. This shall include, but will not be limited to:

...
(e) unnecessarily running, diving into, cutting, or throwing the body against or on a player who (i) is out of
the play or (ii) should not have reasonably anticipated such contact by an opponent, before or after
the ball is dead...



It's the crap rules guys. The game has been going this way for awhile

That rule doesn't apply. Ball is in play as is Nolan, Harris knocks him in his rear end.

Edit: the ball actually hits about a yard from where Nolan was half a second after he is cleanly planted.

Great play by Dwayne Harris
 

TrailBlazer

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,841
Reaction score
3,525
That rule doesn't apply. Ball is in play as is Nolan, Harris knocks him in his rear end.

Edit: the ball actually hits about a yard from where Nolan was half a second after he is cleanly planted.

Great play by Dwayne Harris

Unnecessarily throwing the body against a player who should not have reasonably anticipated such contact by an opponent before or after the ball is dead...

It could apply for anything.. this is football.. The rule shouldn't have been enforced, but the rules are what they are.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
The call (non-call actually) worse than that was the Eagles DB holding Dez's arms with the ball in the air, without making a play on the ball. That's why I'm optimistic about the second game with the Eagles, their secondary won't be able to make up the talent gap by mugging Dallas receivers.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
True. Still have to wonder how the game would've gone had the cowboys been able to respond with a strong opening drive. But it was thwarted by the refs complete ineptness to know what pass interference is even when it was a text book example.

The Cowboys need to alter their offense with the realization that the Cowboys receivers are going to get mugged often without penalties. The Cowboys defense has struggled with offenses that use pick plays. The Cowboys offense really needs to push the boundaries of the rules with these types of plays. Also, I think some quick slants would be less prone to interference than the slower developing routes that the Cowboys seem to prefer.
 

JPostSam

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,810
Reaction score
1,481
Unnecessarily throwing the body against a player who should not have reasonably anticipated such contact by an opponent before or after the ball is dead...

It could apply for anything.. this is football.. The rule shouldn't have been enforced, but the rules are what they are.

a guy running down the field at full speed to plaster an opposing player should not have to worry about being plastered himself. that's just not fair.

[/sarcasm]
 

coult44

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,875
Reaction score
7,653
They want to sissyfy football. Make it soft, for the girly men to play. This is the reason that there will not be a game as we know it in 10-15 years.
 
Top