I think at this point, most GM's would take Dak now over Wentz, but I also have no doubt there are still some, for whatever reason, that would take Wentz over him. I'm sure there would be some that couldn't look past their team's scouting report that says Wentz should be the better QB, regardless what is actually the case on an NFL field.Who hear still believes there's not a single GM in the league who'd draft Dak over Wentz? Or that only a complete and total homer would think that to begin with? Raise you're hands, y'all.
I think at this point, most GM's would take Dak now over Wentz, but I also have no doubt there are still some, for whatever reason, that would take Wentz over him. I'm sure there would be some that couldn't look past their team's scouting report that says Wentz should be the better QB, regardless what is actually the case on an NFL field.
We've seen Dak play when all the chips are down and the resuls are comeback victories. We don't need to lose to see that.What we haven't seen yet is how Dak reacts to adversity in the form of a losing streak and all the pressure/complaining/judgments that come along with it. Mind you, I don't care enough to wish a string of losses on the Cowboys, but I do believe you see the real side of players when the chips are down. It wouldn't bother me one bit if we never had a chance to see that situation, but I am curious.
What we haven't seen yet is how Dak reacts to adversity in the form of a losing streak and all the pressure/complaining/judgments that come along with it. Mind you, I don't care enough to wish a string of losses on the Cowboys, but I do believe you see the real side of players when the chips are down. It wouldn't bother me one bit if we never had a chance to see that situation, but I am curious.
We've seen Dak play when all the chips are down and the resuls are comeback victories. We don't need to lose to see that.
I'm not sure losing games really changes anything. If you lose, you lose, and you try again the following week. I can't imagine that changing Dak's play. All a player can do is do their best, regardless of outcome. Losing doesn't change that.I'm talking about a larger scope than single game adversity. I'm talking about situations that make some question themselves. Losing streaks, back to back multiple INT games... things like that. Dak seems so cool that I feel he would overcome it, but it is still an unknown.
What we haven't seen yet is how Dak reacts to adversity in the form of a losing streak and all the pressure/complaining/judgments that come along with it. Mind you, I don't care enough to wish a string of losses on the Cowboys, but I do believe you see the real side of players when the chips are down. It wouldn't bother me one bit if we never had a chance to see that situation, but I am curious.
Don't feel bad, I had to google "google".I had to google nuanced.
How many rookie QBs have started with the best offensive line in the NFL, the best RB in the NFL, an elite receiver, and a Hall of Fame tight end?
These discussions need perspective.
You have to give the rookie his due. Compare the 2014 offense with Romo, who had all of those things in the prime of his career, to the 2016 offense with Prescott, who had never taken a snap in the NFL.How many rookie QBs have started with the best offensive line in the NFL, the best RB in the NFL, an elite receiver, and a Hall of Fame tight end?
These discussions need perspective.
Zeke is dominating. Dak is just doing a good job. There's a big difference.zeke can be called the best though? isn't he a rookie on a team with a very good qb that works with an elite receiver, hof te, and best offensive line in the nfl? the same line dmac dominated behind the year before and murray before that?
romo dominated with these pieces, but so did dmac and murray. can't call zeke the best in the nfl without giving dak major credit as well.
Zeke is dominating. Dak is just doing a good job. There's a big difference.