ESPN Lays Off Ed Werder

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,667
Reaction score
32,043
Most people can see this isn't political, but rather, budgetary.

Well... I think most people can see that. Maybe I am wrong.

Not everyone sees it. I think what's at play here is:

Larger salaries vs. smaller salaries
1. Journalists and reporters particularly at ESPN get paid handsomely, including the top guys. That includes salary and benefits. Companies use layoffs to purge the top of the salary structure because salaries and benefits make up more than 50 percent of any company's budget.

Media traditionalists vs. media progressives
2. There are many journalists who are of the old school. They just want to report the stories. They don't want to give their opinions or engage the readers/viewers with opinions because they have been taught to keep their opinions to themselves. The new wave of journalists are very opinionated. And companies in this digital age want more of that engagement. That's one of the reasons I didn't return to journalism after I was laid off. I know I give my opinions here. But I was uncomfortable giving my opinions or engaging readers in the way that it's done today. I don't like this mixing of journalism and opinions. And it's being done more and more not just on the editorial side but in the news reporting.

Brand names vs. non-brand names
3. It's all about who has a brand. Stephen A. Smith has a brand. Skip Bayless has a brand. Scott Van Pelt has a brand. Trent Dilfer does not. Jean-Jacques Taylor does not. Ed Werner does not. They're just commentators, writers, on-air talent - a dime a dozen. If Stephen A. Smith leaves, it will hurt ESPN. If Werner leaves, eh.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,667
Reaction score
32,043
I honestly can't believe people are this naive. Must be a millennial thing. Guess I better get used to people not being able to read through the lines. :rolleyes:

Anyway...back to more important things.... like the draft.

I'm not a millennial. ;)
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
Trent Dilfer seriously knows football but damn that guy talks like he won 8 Super Bowls in a row by himself.
 

rynochop

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,761
Reaction score
4,653
Read a comment that they got rid of Dilfer cause they had to many bald ex QBs
 

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,695
Reaction score
4,876
Not everyone sees it. I think what's at play here is:

Larger salaries vs. smaller salaries
1. Journalists and reporters particularly at ESPN get paid handsomely, including the top guys. That includes salary and benefits. Companies use layoffs to purge the top of the salary structure because salaries and benefits make up more than 50 percent of any company's budget.

Media traditionalists vs. media progressives
2. There are many journalists who are of the old school. They just want to report the stories. They don't want to give their opinions or engage the readers/viewers with opinions because they have been taught to keep their opinions to themselves. The new wave of journalists are very opinionated. And companies in this digital age want more of that engagement. That's one of the reasons I didn't return to journalism after I was laid off. I know I give my opinions here. But I was uncomfortable giving my opinions or engaging readers in the way that it's done today. I don't like this mixing of journalism and opinions. And it's being done more and more not just on the editorial side but in the news reporting.

Brand names vs. non-brand names
3. It's all about who has a brand. Stephen A. Smith has a brand. Skip Bayless has a brand. Scott Van Pelt has a brand. Trent Dilfer does not. Jean-Jacques Taylor does not. Ed Werner does not. They're just commentators, writers, on-air talent - a dime a dozen. If Stephen A. Smith leaves, it will hurt ESPN. If Werner leaves, eh.


Tying into that, is that they handed over large, large contracts for NFL and NBA rights....

Larger contracts, larger payroll expenses = larger total expenses
Declining viewership = less revenue

To me, its a pretty simple picture.

I think the other points you bring up are as to how they decided who was staying versus going.
 

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,695
Reaction score
4,876
I honestly can't believe people are this naive. Must be a millennial thing. Guess I better get used to people not being able to read through the lines. :rolleyes:

Anyway...back to more important things.... like the draft.


I am a millennial.

But when I hear hoof beats in North America, I think horse, not zebra.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,667
Reaction score
32,043
Tying into that, is that they handed over large, large contracts for NFL and NBA rights....

Larger contracts, larger payroll expenses = larger total expenses
Declining viewership = less revenue

To me, its a pretty simple picture.

I think the other points you bring up are as to how they decided who was staying versus going.

Definitely. Thanks for the addition.
 
Top