So IM hearing talking heads discussing the actual ruling and words from the judge. Ive not read it, but it apparently says that Watson used "Predatory," behavior. Ok... so what exactly does the CBA say about predatory behavior? Im gonna veer off into criminal law, so this wont apply to Watson's case.
So im guessing their is no legal penalty for "Predatory," behavior. Lets say I go into a bar and I sit down and scan the room. I look the room over and see a lady at the end of the bar. Now I only went into this bar hoping to hook up with a lady and get sex out of the encounter. So, I se her and say yep... thats the one. So I ask the bartender to send over a drink to her. Is this my first "Predatory," action? Ok, she makes eye contact with me, so I head on over and have a seat with her. Predatory? Keep in mind, the only reason I bought the drink and sat next to her is because im looking to get her into bed. So we start talking, im listening to her and now I start tailoring my words in a way to ingratiate myself to her. IM lying through my teeth about working with foster youth on the weekends because she has said she is a counselor. I smile the best smile I can muster and I continue this charade for about 2 hours.... keep in mind the entire time Im talking with her, im looking her up and down thinking what is my next best approach to get her up to my hotel room. Predatory?
Eventually, my gamble has paid off, and she comes with me to my room and I have the best sex of her life, I then ask her to leave and refuse to give her my cell number as I would hate for my wife to find out about this. Predatory? Sure, to me it is 100% predatory... problem is, Im not thinking that any of those actions actually break a law.
So when the talking heads are getting all upset over certain words, Id like for them to relate the word back to the CBA so I can understand how that specific action applies.