Besides that, the two cases are different. People seem to like to use the Zeke case as precedent, it can't be done. That's a domestic violence case, Watson's isn't.
We all want to simplify things and rage against the "fairness" of it all, but real life doesn't work that way.
It's better for us to understand what is actually happening and consider that life isn't fair, but rules are rules and those rules were agreed upon by both parties.
I understand the rage.
I do.
I also understand why the decision is what it is.
Maybe Goodell appeals.
He must be weighing how bad a precedent it will appear to be, appealing the very first of these kind of decisions from an independent arby, but I'm sure he'll have some highly-paid legal eagles in his ear on the subject.