Et Tu Sturm

[CowboysFaninHouston]

I am able to have independent critical thought. I don't have to see what someone else says before I'm able to analyze and develop an opinion.

I don't have an issue with you commenting. Again, another strawman.

But when you did, try and stick to what's said.
You just look foolish trying to attribute comments and opinions of person A to person C.

so you like to jump in the middle of a conversation, having not heard or purposely ignored anything discussed previously and claim you can provide independent thought!? out of context...OOOKKK then

 

[Kevinicus]

so you like to jump in the middle of a conversation, having not heard or purposely ignored anything discussed previously and claim you can provide independent thought!? out of context...OOOKKK then

Again...strawmen. It's all you have. You can't actual discuss the topic so you flail about.

I read every comment up to what I responded to. The comment I responded to was the other person's first post in this thread and was in response to the original post. There was no context to be had besides the original post and that post.
The context is the play in question. I discussed facts about what was going on in that play.

Whatever other nonsense you're trying to go on about is imagined in your head.

Now, haven't you tried to derail this thread from the topic enough already?

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Again...strawmen. It's all you have. You can't actual discuss the topic so you flail about.

I read every comment up to what I responded to. The comment I responded to was the other person's first post in this thread and was in response to the original post. There was no context to be had besides the original post and that post.
The context is the play in question. I discussed facts about what was going on in that play.

Whatever other nonsense you're trying to go on about is imagined in your head.

Now, haven't you tried to derail this thread from the topic enough already?

sure thing. oookkk then.not sure what it is you trying to argue about as seemingly you are not able to stay on topic....good luck.

 

[Kevinicus]

sure thing. oookkk then.not sure what it is you trying to argue about as seemingly you are not able to stay on topic....good luck.

The topic = the play from the OP. Not that hard. Now you know.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

The topic = the play from the OP. Not that hard. Now you know.

ook, then...sure thing.....and that very play was turned into a generalization about Dak...that was the point...so thanks for confirming.

 

[SackMaster]

Does anyone know if this is before or after Lamb was on the sideline demanding the ball?

It doesn't absolve Dak in any way, he should have found and thrown to the open guy. I'm just wondering the timing of the play vs the Lamb sideline incident.

 

[Kevinicus]

ook, then...sure thing.....and that very play was turned into a generalization about Dak...that was the point...so thanks for confirming.

Not by me it wasn't.