Corso
Offseason mode... sleepy time
- Messages
- 34,634
- Reaction score
- 62,871
Ah dude..."I told you I'd call you when my wife was on the plane!"
Funny, but I'm not like that. My wife is the best thing... ever.
Ever ever.
Still, lol.
Ah dude..."I told you I'd call you when my wife was on the plane!"
That would depend on how she looks.So my maid can just come over and wander around because she's my maid on, say, a Saturday night while I'm watching a movie?
You guys!That would depend on how she looks.
Give her nothing until she proves otherwise.
Actually, I am correct because I have dealt with that situation two different times and know for a fact.You are incorrect. You can absolutely get trespassed whether it's your employer or not. Only way she can prove she was allowed to be there is a contract or something from Zeke saying so on that day, at that time.
Just because she worked for him, she can not show up when she wants to. Period. Saying otherwise is a wrong statement.
If Zeke didn't give her permission to be there at that time she won't get a penny.
My house cleaner answers to my wife. As do i most times.You guys!
Bunch of cretins around here! Lol!
Goofballs...
If you gave her a key (or access code) to your house, it would be very difficult to get a trespass ruling.
Again, I think most people are not reading what I am posting. I am not saying it is "right" or that the woman did nothing wrong.
I am saying that "trespassing" is very difficult to prove if they work for you or "sometimes" have permission to your house.
I know how you feel about her, brother. I'm envious of your situation.Ah dude...
Funny, but I'm not like that. My wife is the best thing... ever.
Ever ever.
Still, lol.
One day we'll meet up and have a drink, or three my friend.I know how you feel about her, brother. I'm envious of your situation.
You are arguing "what's right" not what the law is going to support.They don’t have to prove criminal trespassing for her to be at fault. It’s not like they are looking to press charges on her. I think Zeke’s lawyer used that word for the dramatic effect it would have. Bottom line is if she came on a different day and didn’t inform Zeke which she was required to do, then there is no negligence on Zeke’s part What is he supposed to? Lock his dogs away 24 hours a day because someone might show up unannounced?
The original smoked meat.One day we'll meet up and have a drink, or three my friend.
I hope.
Oh yeah! About to make jerky again. The request line is open.
I make some mean stuff. Ask @Runwildboys .The original smoked meat.
So my maid can just come over and wander around because she's my maid on, say, a Saturday night while I'm watching a movie?
I have a story about the first day I moved to Los Angeles (West Hollywood) involving something similar, but I'll PM it to you.Depends. If its the opening scene of the adult film you guys are making, its fine.
Sounds like what I’ve been saying all day could be the case. She showed up unannounced at an unscheduled time and date and went in the backyard without checking for dogs. I’ve said numerous times that pool service people are notorious for this. They may tell you Tuesday and not show up. Then just come on Wednesday when you are at work and let themselves in the yard. If they don’t check for dogs first, they are negligent, not the homeowner.
Her options are to seek a settlement, civil trial, nlrb investigation, and even possibly workman's comp. I'm guessing a future settlement will be forthcoming.You are arguing "what's right" not what the law is going to support.
From a "what's right" standpoint, I completely agree. The problem is that her lawyer labeled her an "employee" which is going to provide an extra layer of liability on Elliott as a result.
Otherwise, an employer of an employee who gets hurt while working at the employer's office, house, etc. could easily say, "They were not supposed to work that day so it's not my fault." whether true or not.
The law is going to be on her side in this case regardless of whether she followed the instructions perfectly. Not following instructions is grounds for termination, but until that formally happens or she commits a crime against her employer, there are labor protection laws that are going to side with her.
Guilty before a trial is presumed, not assumed. The latter only requires common sense. The former is mandated.Interesting since we've heard the OTHER side. It's odd to me how people can assume guilt hearing one side of an issue. As stated in another thread, for me, it's not about Zeke but fairness.
Whatever you like best is probably what you make best.One day we'll meet up and have a drink, or three my friend.
I hope.
Oh yeah! About to make jerky again. The request line is open.
As did several people I know, who served as a focus group. Not one complaint!I make some mean stuff. Ask @Runwildboys .
And he got an experimental flavor.