LittleBoyBlue
Redvolution
- Messages
- 35,766
- Reaction score
- 8,411
DallasEast;2007268 said:The thing about the original Battlestar Galactica is that it was literally the Bonanza of television science fiction--pardon the pun. If ever there was an actor, who benefitted from a show that was basically created just for them, it was Lorne Green.
Don't get me wrong. It was a good show, but sometimes during an episode I could hear the Bonanza theme song playing in the back of my mind. The Colonial Warriors were dressed as cowboys (excuse that pun also)--from the jackets they wore to their sidearms. The show had too much of a Western-style series (Rawhide comes to mind) which always kept me wanted for more substance from its central plot:
"What would REALLY happen if a civilization was almost totally wiped out and the survivors were forced to find a new home?"
IMO, this is where the remake of the series succeeds and where the original series fell short. The new show digs deeper into the human element of 'What if?'. The enemy is totally ruthless and deadly cunning. The old show showcased clumsy overgrown robots in shiny tin suits. BG2 is a gritty little show and I'm going to miss it's more hard-edged dramatic vision. The final season premieres next month.
...of course, not everything about the show is hard-edged. There is Number 6 and Boomer for example...
For a very good, 8-minute, fast-paced (and funny!) summary of the series thus far, check out http://video.scifi.com/player/?id=224004 .
Yeah the old one was good for the times.
Nowadays there is more emphasis on GOOD storylines, interweaving storylines and character building.
I have only watched a few episodes of the BSG online from this past season. Its ok.
I may have to watch all the seasons to really see whats what. I liked the OLD armored cylons better than the new ones... the new ones are too terminator-like LOL