Yeagermeister
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,629
- Reaction score
- 117
Ok everyone just needs to cool off. Let's stop with the name calling.
cowboys2233;2157903 said:No, he wants to play for a team that has a chance of making the playoffs. He is not going to go to a pathetic team to get his head beaten in simply to play.
Yes, that is what some in the media would like you to believe, but c'mon, that's just not reality. He holds all the cards, that's all there is to it. If he actually agrees to play for the Jets, Bucs, or some other worthless team, he is a total chump.
whatever dude, but one thing if you do not know me don't pass judgement on me. i never once called you any names but if thats what you want whatever.cowboys2233;2157917 said:Holy ****, I give up. You are truly an idiot. But thanks for letting me know what it would be like.
From the article above:
A rare talent, Packers quarterback Brett Favre now holds a rare distinction.
Without having an official no-trade clause in his contract, Favre has an unofficial no-trade clause in the leverage he has.
If the Packers agree to trade Favre to any team, the quarterback can veto the deal simply by declining to report. Then Favre's rights would revert back to Green Bay, which would be forced to take him back along with his $12 million base salary -- or release him.
To carry's Favre salary, and all the distractions that came along with it, would be an enormous financial and emotional burden for the Packers. Thus Green Bay would have to commit to keeping Favre or to trade him.
But unless it is a team that appeals to Favre then the Packers quarterback can continue vetoing deals until he has a satisfactory new home.
Basically, if Favre unretires he gets to play where he wants.
cowboys2233;2157892 said:Think about what? Either they trade him to a team he wants to go to (because he has veto power), they pay him $12 million to sit on the bench and play mindgames with Rodgers, or they release him.
Again, why am I supposed to believe that Favre is simply going to agree to go to a team he doesn't want to go to?
cowboys2233;2157917 said:Holy ****, I give up. You are truly an idiot. But thanks for letting me know what it would be like.
Romo2Owens4six;2157928 said:whatever dude, but one thing if you do not know me don't pass judgement on me. i never once called you any names but if thats what you want whatever.
ajk23az;2157929 said:Cowboys2233 is pretty much right. The Packers won't be able to trade him to a team he doesnt want to play for. Then the Packers either have the option to release him or keep him.
Favre doesn't have an OFFICIAL no-trade clause but he has his own unique one. Check out the article written by Adam Schefter...
http://www.nfl.com/news/story;jsess...e=with-video&confirm=true&id=09000d5d8094bd7a
Romo2Owens4six;2157938 said:yeah i understand all that i was just saying my point is this:
Neither Favre nor his agent, Bus Cook, has revealed which teams, or team, that would be, though speculation has swirled around Minnesota and Carolina. Yet it is as inconceivable to think Green Bay would trade Favre in its division as it is that it would release him, giving him the same option.
trickblue;2157725 said:Favre will file a letter of reinstatement today and report to Packer TC according to NFLN via KTCK...
aikemirv;2157930 said:Well according to Cheif and Thumper he would not veto all trades because that would hurt his media image that he has worked so hard to manipulate over his career.
yeah ok so sue me no wonder you have been banned before, but thats ok because Farve doesn't have anything to do with me. personally i have never liked him and never will.cowboys2233;2157936 said:Yeah, the whole "t-a-l-k-s-l-o-w" thing was a real compliment. Are you kidding me?
cowboys2233;2157947 said:Oh, well as long as Chief and Thumper say that, it must be true. :LOL
He won't veto all trades, just trades that don't send him to the Vikings. :LOL
I guess he could possibly agree to play for the Bucs, but only if he is actually delusional enough to think they have a shot of making the playoffs.
But again, he holds all the cards. If he really wants to play for the Vikings, he can veto everything and force the Pack to keep him, pay him $12 million and sit on the bench. Is that really an option? No way.
cowboys2233;2157947 said:Oh, well as long as Chief and Thumper say that, it must be true. :LOL
He won't veto all trades, just trades that don't send him to the Vikings. :LOL
I guess he could possibly agree to play for the Bucs, but only if he is actually delusional enough to think they have a shot of making the playoffs.
But again, he holds all the cards. If he really wants to play for the Vikings, he can veto everything and force the Pack to keep him, pay him $12 million and sit on the bench. Is that really an option? No way.
yeah that was my point they would rather pay him then him beat thim twice a yearajk23az;2157944 said:Yeah I know what your saying. I'd say if the Packers can't find a suitor in the AFC or outside of its division, they will just pay him the 12 million and sit him on the bench.
Panthers already said they don't really want him. So the best guesses are the Bucs or Jets.
ajk23az;2157944 said:Yeah I know what your saying. I'd say if the Packers can't find a suitor in the AFC or outside of its division, they will just pay him the 12 million and sit him on the bench.
Romo2Owens4six;2157953 said:yeah that was my point they would rather pay him then him beat thim twice a year
ajk23az;2157959 said:Yup but they could also choose to "Keyshawn" him like the Bucs did. Pay him and ban him from practices and all that stuff so he doesn't cause distractions to the team.
But some team will take a shot on Favre.
cowboys2233;2157958 said:Finally! At least that is one possible solution. But is that really better than actually trading him to the Vikings and getting a pretty high draft choice (possibly even a #1) out of the deal? IMO, no way.
Yeagermeister;2157967 said:I believe the NFL won't let a team do that anymore.